|
|||
|
Re: Which LttP manual is more canon
Quote:
I can't deny that it is an implication, but it could have just been telling the history of the Triforce up to the point that it went into the SR. Quote:
I have a question, though. Why do you think that the implication from one line that the SW was the first time that the Triforce was touched as more important than the multiple implications throughout the manual and the game's plot implying that nothing happened to Ganon or the Triforce between the SW and LttP?
__________________
Did you know that rigor mortis can set in instantaneously due to heavy or violent excercise, and high body tempatures? This effect is called a cadaveric spasm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadaveric_spasm That's my new pick-up line
|

|
|||
|
Re: Which LttP manual is more canon
@Som:
The removal of Ganon and the knights is what I'm talking about. That deliberately cuts things out wheras the rest of the manual only shortens things down to extremity.
__________________
Quote:
|

| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Tags |
| canon, lttp, manual |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|