|
||||||||||||||
|
The SNES American Manual can be Canon
Intro
This thread is my personal opinion based on text. All I am doing is analyzing the text in this manual. I honestly don't know whether it was confirmed that the GBA retcons the SNES manual, among other things, such as there being only one master sword in all of zelda, but I'll assume it was. Personally I don't see how 1000 words of text can be retconned by 100, but that's just me. The Nitty Gritty Okay this is very unorganized because I got lazy at some point. I may have repeated some stuff. I picked what I thought might be the parts of the SNES American manual that don't make sense at first, but if viewed in another way, it can still be canon. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The king asked the sages and knights to seal the entrance of the sacred realm (which is where the source of evil, ganon, resides in). The hylians are elsewhere, they are not and will not be included in the battle that will commence. The gods told these hylians to make a master sword. The creation of the master sword can be done without the sages and knights' awareness since the gods only told the hylians and the hylians are not with the sages or knights. Then the sages eventually caught wind of its creation, maybe they doubted the rumor at first since one of the versions says "looked for its existence", and so they looked for it and a hero to use it. As they were looking for both, the army/malice made it to the castle, so the sages gave up and joined the knights again. The knights gave the sages enough time to seal the entrance of the realm, preventing ganon from escaping it. I would say that if this master sword is the first one, then alttp would go before oot in the timeline but I assume there are inconsistencies with that, yet I haven't really thought about it and if I do feel like trying to find a way for alttp-oot or alttp-...-oot to work if someone brings up any problems then I will go for it. ALTTP has its own time, it's own version of characters and settings. The Hylians are more closer to the gods than the sages, in this time. Even the japanese texts say: Quote:
Quote:
The hylians made the master sword in this time, not sages or gods. I can see how two master swords can be created in different times. Quote:
Quote:
The hylian sages are with the knights. These sages know the master sword was created because they also heard the gods. The people of Hyrule, who are away from them, were the ones who actually made it. Upon hearing this, the sages went to look for the master sword so that they can see it for themselves, and also went to look for someone who can use it. However, the evil was quicker than them, so the sages had to hurry back to the knights and fight without the sword. The Jap Manual doesn't state the master sword predates ganon, or that it was so old that no one remembered where it was. Because none of that is stated there, there are other possibilities for the story in the manual. ALTTP can have its own settings and characters because it is in a different time than OoT for example. In OoT one guy says "they say hylians can hear the gods but i haven't heard anything". All he does is try to listen to them from a high place, market town in the past, kakariko tower in the future. ALTTP thieves opened the entrance, OoT Link did. I don't know who made the master sword in OoT. ALTTP does not have to match with OoT or any other zelda game, it can have its own version of things, like having more hylians as sages, and the OoT races not being so important to ALTTP Hyrule (the zoras seem to be just monsters except the one who gives you flippers). The creation of the master sword in ALTTP does not have to be the one from OoT whether or not the OoT's Master sword origin differs from ALTtp's. In general, a sword can get lost and a new one can be made in the same way. The reason why there is more than one possibility for what the manual is talking about is because a lot of the text can be viewed differently. In some cases, like this manual, not everything stated is set in stone, there is more than one legit way of interpreting that information. The translator is no exception. Repel does not always mean prevent. To repel an evil kidnapping of the triforce with an expel evil sword can mean to oppose/destroy an evil who already took it. The sages looked for a hero to use it after the triforce was taken. The master sword in ALTTP is not the master sword in OoT. OoT's prevents evil from lifting the sword and opposes them in a hero's hands. ALTTP's is just used to fight any evil who already has the triforce. In ALTtP, the triforce is already in evil's hands and the king already ordered the sages and the knights to seal the golden land. Then the sages looked for a master sword so that someone noble can use it to possibly kill the triforce wielding Ganon. The sages/wisemen didn't use or even need the master sword to make the seal. The knights defended them and the wisemen did their job and prevented ganon from entering the light world. The IW master sword aka alttp's master sword is not the key to the sacred realm like oot's master sword. Otherwise the sword would not be needed for searching since the sages and knights were sent to the entrance beforehand. Because of its origin, there is no problem with hylians making another master sword. It is, was, and will always be possible. OoT's master sword prevents evil from lifting the sword to enter the sacred realm. There is no other way to get in there than to have a hero lift it. About OoT's master sword not shooting out beams: Quote:
Quote:
OoT's master sword doesn't shoot out sword beams. altTp's does. A sword beam doesn't shoot out of a fully powered alttp link's first sword, but a sword beam can be shot out of the master sword by a fully powered alttp link. All ALTTP's IW sages are hylian. Not all hylians are sages. The manual still makes distinctions between hylians and sages during certain portions. The manual says a master sword was made by hylians. This part can refer to the IW, which is not OoT according to texts. It doesn't say the sages made this one. The sages looked for a person to use the sword as well as the sword itself, which wouldn't be necessary if the sages were involved in making it in the first place. OoT's sword can be different than alttps, easily. My interpretation of this manual is valid. In oot, you have to enter the sacred realm to get the triforce. The master sword has to be lifted to open the entrance of the sacred realm. Rauru said the master sword was the final key to the sacred realm. Conclusion: This master sword was created to function as a seal to the sacred realm. Only one worthy of the title "hero of time" can lift it, not just any good person. Resources SNES Manual: http://www.zeldalegends.net/files/te...ual_story.html GBA Manual: Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|

|
|||||||
|
Re: The SNES American Manual can be Canon
I'm not going to respond to everything here.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|

| Advertisement |
|
||||||||
|
Re: The SNES American Manual can be Canon
Quote:
Here it is : Quote:
Some people can take "repel" to mean to prevent the lifting of the sword. And like I said before, the translator's commentary does not always equal WIN. There are more cases where they actually choose to define what a statement means, from options. Here's another: Quote:
Quote:
Like I also said, the part where they said how the master sword was created can refer to the IW and not necessarily OoT's origin of the master sword, especially considering that part of hte alttp manual is in the Imprisoning War sEction.
__________________
Quote:
|

|
|||
|
Re: The SNES American Manual can be Canon
Quote:
For example, the clarifications of TWW's "Hero of Time reborn" line, or the parts involving descendants, are not merely an interpretation. Because while the English words used in the translations of those lines still have multiple meanings, including the literal one, that doesn't make it a valid interpretation. The Japanese word used still has its own specific applications and meanings. There isn't a 1:1 Japanese to English conversion, and you can't assume that just because you can read the translation, you know exactly what the Japanese wording is implying. This is exactly what translation notes are for, and why it's generally important to take them into account. This is actually one of the reasons ALttP's manual implies that it must take place before LoZ. And, yes, it sure as hell means that the Master Sword dates back to long before Ganon. How can you even question this as canon, when we know it as a fact from OoT and TP?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|

| Advertisement |
|
||
|
Re: The SNES American Manual can be Canon
Again, not responding to everything.
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|

|
|||
|
Re: The SNES American Manual can be Canon
Also, god, the US SNES manual also had "Ganondorf Dragmire". There are some blatant errors and misrepresentation of canon involving the goddesses, the Triforce, the Master Sword, and the events of the IW themselves. Most of it is retconned by OoT or by ALttP GBA, which shows that they were errors. Why do we need to discuss taking into account a non-canon source?
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|

| Advertisement |
|
||||||||||
|
Re: The SNES American Manual can be Canon
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So it's been established that they sometimes look at other quotes to determine a meaning for the first one. I highlighted the master sword one here: Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|

![]() |
| Tags |
| american, canon, manual, snes |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|