Hyrule castle in Wind waker the same in FSA

More assumptions, the only true is that with PH nintendo don't conect your beloved chronology. For now there isn't new hyrule in the AT.

So? They obviously haven't found it yet. And what do YOU think they were up to before they heard about the Ghost Ship? What were they doing in foreign seas?

You said PH proves that a New Hyrule isn't their goal. PH doesn't disprove anything. Besides, our timelines hold even if Link and Tetra were not the ones who founded New Hyrule.

Originally Posted by smallville boy

He only say that the new land will not be "HYRULE".

Like I said, Daphnes meant it will not be the original Hyrule. It'll just be a landmass with the same damn name. Learn to read the entire thread properly.

Originally Posted by Caulaincourt

So? They obviously haven't found it yet. And what do YOU think they were up to before they heard about the Ghost Ship? What were they doing in foreign seas?

You said PH proves that a New Hyrule isn't their goal. PH doesn't disprove anything. Besides, our timelines hold even if Link and Tetra were not the ones who founded New Hyrule.

Find a new hyrule isn't their current goal and isn't their future goal.

Tetra:
I t o l d y o u n o t t o c a l l m e
Z e l d a !
T e t r a w o r k e d j u s t f i n e
b e f o r e , y o u k n o w .
(mako: B u t . . . y o u ' r e t h e p r i n c e s s o f
a w h o l e k i n g d o m !
I c a n ' t g o t r e a t i n g y o u
l i k e a p i r a t e )
Y o u ' d b e t t e r s t a r t t r y i n g ,
M a k o !
I m a y b e a p r i n c e s s , b u t
I ' m a f e a r s o m e p i r a t e .
I ' m t r a v e l i n g t h e w o r l d i n
s e a r c h o f n e w l a n d s .

In PH they traveling the world in search of new lands Just like in the begining of WW.


Your timelines holds even if the world explodes,because your timelines are just fan fiction.

Like I said, Daphnes meant it will not be the original Hyrule. It'll just be a landmass with the same damn name. Learn to read the entire thread properly.

He never said original hyrule, or old hyrule, he just said will not be "HYRULE"

He doesn't have to say it. He IMPLIED it.

And nothing ever said finding a new Hyrule wasn't their goal.

Originally Posted by Lady Ranny

He doesn't have to say it. He IMPLIED it.

No he don't, you did.

And nothing ever said finding a new Hyrule wasn't their goal

see my previous post.

Now you're not even making any sense.

And I did read your whole post and it proves nothing.

Dhapnes implies nothing, you are the only one who did implications and asumptions, he said that the new land will not be Hyrule, and tetra in PH continue her live as a pirate.

FSA (and the entire FS subseries, actually) is a perfect bridge between TWW and LttP. So the castle would be no exception. It looks exactly the same as TWW castle from the outside, but is incredibly similar to the LttP one in the inside.

And yes, i'm probably the only person here who believes in deflooding. Why? Well, mainly beacuse the LttP map matches the OoT map almost perfectly. Everything is on the same place relatively to other places.

There can be no other explanation, seriously. They didn't have to make the castle in FSA look exactly like the one in TWW. They didn't do it in TMC, which uses the same art style and has many more connections to TWW.

So, yes, the trees have to bring more land up the sealevel, and, together, they will bring the MS and the castle...

Daphnes cannot control what the trees can do, and he probably didn't know that they could do so. So, he sent the HoW and Tetra to look for new lands (as they are doing in PH), while New Hyrule slowly comes back from the bottom of the ocean...

I've considered this before, but the inside castle connections between FSA and ALttP are much more evidance then the outside of the castle.

FSA (and the entire FS subseries, actually) is a perfect bridge between TWW and LttP. So the castle would be no exception. It looks exactly the same as TWW castle from the outside, but is incredibly similar to the LttP one in the inside.

And yes, i'm probably the only person here who believes in deflooding. Why? Well, mainly beacuse the LttP map matches the OoT map almost perfectly. Everything is on the same place relatively to other places.

If that's the case then TMC would have to be first on your timeline as it's castle is completely different from FS and FSA's.

Also why would there be two possibilities for a new Hyrule:
1. Finding land
2. GDT's plan.......

and then have a de-flood occur it makes NO SENCE. Also if that's the case then FSA and LoZ's Geo doesn't even WORK for you.

Also @ Lord Ranny: Get out. This is my territory.

Originally Posted by Pinecove

If that's the case then TMC would have to be first on your timeline as it's castle is completely different from FS and FSA's.

It is similar to LttP's however. The FS subseries shouldn't be taken as a separate entity.

Plus they made FSA castle similar to both TWW's and LttP's fora reson...

[/quote]Also why would there be two possibilities for a new Hyrule:
1. Finding land
2. GDT's plan.......

and then have a de-flood occur it makes NO SENCE. Also if that's the case then FSA and LoZ's Geo doesn't even WORK for you.[/quote]

Sorry? Geo makes no sense for me? Are you blind?
And why doesn't deflooding make sense? Your opinion =/= fact.

It is similar to LttP's however. The FS subseries shouldn't be taken as a separate entity.

So FS/FSA-ALttP-TMC? While that does work for the comparisons (hey look at Link's house!) just...WTF. The castle in ALttP IS NOT the castle in TMC.

Don't be an idiot.

Plus they made FSA castle similar to both TWW's and LttP's fora reson...

Hmmm. PERHAPS BECAUSE FSA WAS MEANT TO BE A CT GAME WITH TMC FIRST!!!

Originally Posted by smallville boy

Dhapnes implies nothing, you are the only one who did implications and asumptions, he said that the new land will not be Hyrule, and tetra in PH continue her live as a pirate.

Saying that the new land will not be Hyrule is implying that it will not be the original Hyrule, but another landmass with the same name. There is nothing that says Daphnes did not mean this. Now stop making pointless arguments against it. You're beating a dead horse.

Also, do not steal my facepalm images.

Originally Posted by Pinecove

Also @ Lord Ranny: Get out. This is my territory.

I have every right to post in here, thanks.

EDIT: And to everyone else in this thread, that castle resemblance of FSA to that of TWW is only an artist's rendition, like I said before. It's a map made by an artist from Nintendo who placed it in the game. The structure of the outside of TWW's castle would make no sense to be that of FSA's anyway. It looks too differently shaped. And you can see much of the outside of FSA's castle in-game, which allows you to see that it resembles ALttP's only on both the outside AND inside.

Originally Posted by Smertios

FSA (and the entire FS subseries, actually) is a perfect bridge between TWW and LttP. So the castle would be no exception. It looks exactly the same as TWW castle from the outside, but is incredibly similar to the LttP one in the inside.

Yeah, i played FSA and the castle do look like the one from alttp. But like I said they made it look like the WW castle for a reason, and if you played WW there are Snowy parts surrounding Hyrule, and if that was part of OOT Hyrule there never Snowy parts to Hyrule surrounding Hyrule castle unless that was undiscovered.

And yes, i'm probably the only person here who believes in deflooding. Why? Well, mainly beacuse the LttP map matches the OoT map almost perfectly. Everything is on the same place relatively to other places.

Exactly, alttp matches OOT perfectly. Look at the desert, once the desert hits water it turns into a swamp and, after a while when it dries up it turns back into a desert. The desert can expand, the as same in alttp. The desert had gotten bigger.

There can be no other explanation, seriously. They didn't have to make the castle in FSA look exactly like the one in TWW. They didn't do it in TMC, which uses the same art style and has many more connections to TWW.

At least somebody agrees with me, they didn't have to make FSA castle look like TWW but they did.

So, yes, the trees have to bring more land up the sealevel, and, together, they will bring the MS and the castle...

Finally somebody see my point. The castle was probably rebuilt after the damages, but made look like the on in TWW.

Daphnes cannot control what the trees can do, and he probably didn't know that they could do so. So, he sent the HoW and Tetra to look for new lands (as they are doing in PH), while New Hyrule slowly comes back from the bottom of the ocean...

And, that's probably what the new zelda may be be about. He sent because it didn't know of the deku tree plans. Also I think the deku tree slowly bring the lands together too with the ruins of hyrule by alttp. Because in alttp there are just trees and mountains in the surrounding area of hyrule.

Originally Posted by Pinecove

So FS/FSA-ALttP-TMC? While that does work for the comparisons (hey look at Link's house!) just...WTF. The castle in ALttP IS NOT the castle in TMC.

Don't be an idiot.

We never see the exterior of the castle in TMC! And that's not what i'm arguing.

I'm saying that there must be a reason to why the castle in FSA shares so many similarities to both the TWW castle and the LttP castle.

And the castle in TMC is the castle in FSA and in LttP. Why wouldn't it be? In the interior, the castle is very similar to how it is in LttP.

Hmmm. PERHAPS BECAUSE FSA WAS MEANT TO BE A CT GAME WITH TMC FIRST!!!

As proven by?? Seriously, nothing you say on this matter has ever been proven.

Maybe, in the first development stages of FSA they had plans of making it the SW and all, but, after it was edited and released, this was never the case. The final version of FSA has always been the one it is now, with all the evidence pointing towards its placement in the AT.

So the timeline could have thought to be something like
OoT
.....\MM-TP---FSA---LttP
but they dropped that before releasing the game, which means the timeline never looked like that...

And you have great logics there: the castle in FSA is similar to the one from TWW because the game was planned to go in the CT!

You are starting to sound like an idiot by saying these things, you know...

Originally Posted by brandon211111

And, that's probably what the new zelda may be be about. He sent because it didn't know of the deku tree plans. Also I think the deku tree slowly bring the lands together too with the ruins of hyrule by alttp. Because in alttp there are just trees and mountains in the surrounding area of hyrule.

Exactly. That's conclusive evidence to why the GDT's plan was a success...

TP's castle also resembles TWW's.

Originally Posted by smallville boy

WW hyrule castle gone forever at the end of that game. Just think about it.

He's right at the end of WW Hyrule castle didn't go up nor did it stay in the same place it sunk to the depths of the world.If you have beaten WW you would've known this.

Originally Posted by Mr. Lexxi Aileron

TP's castle also resembles TWW's.

TP's castle is identical to OoT's except for the 6 towers with archs connecting the wall to the castle...

Originally Posted by Smertios

TP's castle is identical to OoT's except for the 6 towers with archs connecting the wall to the castle...

Which are designed after the same towers in TWW. TWW's castle, too, is designed after OoT's.