[QUOTE=Erimgard;2220774]Nothing in the GBA version implies that
OoT can't be the Seal War. In fact, if anything, it helps it out, by removing the time limit of when the war happened.
Possibly, but I'll see what you said about Ganon's escape from the SR between
OoT and
TWW before agreeing with that.
Quote:
|
No it hadn't. Nothing says the Triforce ever left the SR before OoT.
|
Not before, during.
Quote:
|
No, it's not lying. If OoT is the Seal War, it goes perfectly with aLttP saying that the Triforce was still remaining there since creation. Nothing says the Triforce left the SR before OoT, but obviously, it did during/after. Thus, if the manual is true, then the Seal War cannot happen post-OoT.
|
Quote:
|
After many years, an opening was found that led from our fair Hyrule to the Golden Land where the Triforce was still hidden. Many sought treasure in this place, but none returned -- only beings of great evil emerged from the Golden Land.
|
1. Triforce has never left SR
2. SR is already Dark World
3. Opening is found
According to the manual, the opening to the Sacred Realm is found after the SR is turned into Dark World, but before the Triforce leaves the Sacred Realm.
Here is an order of events from
OoT...
1. Opening is found
2. SR is turned into Dark World and Triforce leaves SR
#2 is one event because both parts of it happened at the same moment, when Ganon touched the Triforce. According to the manual, the opening was found after the SR became Dark World. In
OoT, the opening is found before the SR is turned into Dark World.
So the thing in the manual about the Triforce is true, if the Seal War is
OoT. However, the Seal War can't be
OoT, because the condition of the SR, Dark World, is not in agreemaent with the manual. If you can find a way to convince me that I have misinterpreted the manual and the SR is not Dark World before
OoT, you win. If not, well...
I just can't see beings of great evil emerging from the SR if it isn't Dark World.
Quote:
WW never says he broke the seal, he just escaped.
In fact, the Hylian text in the background of the Wind Waker intro has been translated, and it literally explains his reappearance as being "revived for no reason".
No reason is given for how Ganon returned, we just know he did. In aLttP, he makes a huge deal about breaking a Seal cast by Seven Sages...and OoT is the only incident in all Zelda history where we see such a seal being cast.
|
You yourself explained to me that the sages sealed Ganon in the SR as well as placing a seal
the SR. How could Ganon escape the SR without breaking the seal that put him it it? If you put water into a bottle and cap it, you have to take off the cap to get the water out, unless you break open the bottle. I don't think Ganon could break open the SR. He would have to break the seal.
Quote:
I believe it's Zelda's description of Ganon...anyway, it's a highly touchy subject, because NoA translates the line as something like
"Wielder of the Trident, the ancient demon reborn from ancient times"
However, Jumbie, a well-respected translator who has found many NoA mistakes/censors that are plot relevant, believes it is more accurately:
"King of Darkness… The man who took the Trident, the evil device (ja-ki) of the demon resurrected from ancient times!!"
The context is a little hard to decipher, so we can't really tell if it's saying the Trident was resurrected, of if the Demon was resurrected. Either way though, it's referring to the Trident that Ganon now holds as being used by a Demon in the past. I believe this to be a reference to OoX Ganon, who had the Trident, and was a demon resurrected from ancient times.
|
Oh, that. A little shaky, but there nonetheless. Jumbie's translation, however, is different. It says that the device of the resurrected demon was now in the hands of the King of Darkness. So the Ganon that had the trident was resurrected. Then he died, lost the Trident, and it was put in a pyramid where
FSA Ganon found it. Alright. We need to look at the Ganons that had the Trident...
OoX
LoZ
ALttP
Aye, those be the games you place between the Vaati Trilogy and
TWW...interesting. Jumbie's interpretation also makes it sound like the demon that weilded the Trident had been resurrected from ancient times. I don't see how
LoZ is ancient times if OoX isn't. All due respect to Jumbie, but I've never heard of him and have no reason to trust him any more than NoA, so I'll stick with what's in the game. I don't remember what it says exactly, but I'll do my best...
Quote:
|
"Ganon, King of Darkness, weilder of the Trident, ancient demon reborn!"
|
So he's an ancient demon reborn, and he used the Trident to become the King of Darkness. At least that's what makes the most sense to me. Either that or he's an ancient demon reborn, and the ancient demon was the King of Darkness and the weilder of the Trident. I don't think it makes sense that the ancient demon was the King of Darkness, because Zelda thought Vaati was the King of Darkness before seeing Ganon. It sounds like she's just now realizing that Ganon is the King of Darkness. So "King of Darkness" applies to
FSA Ganon, rather than the ancient demon. If the ancient demon is OoX Ganon, as you believe, weilder of the Trident works, but I think it sounds like being the weilder of the Trident is what made Ganon King of Darkness. So if the ancient demon was not the King of Darkness, which I don't think he was, he didn't weild the Trident either. The ancient demon is sounding more and more like
OoT/
TWW Ganon than
LoZ/
AoL---OoX Ganon.
As for Din and Nayru in
TMC, I still think they are the goddesses embodied, so they could appear wherever they want. I don't think they've simply named themselves after their goddeses. I haven't named myself Jesus, God, or the Holy Spirit because he's the god (being the only god there is) that I serve. It's more likely that the Oracles are the goddesses or that the goddesses are at least involved with the Oracles, other than speaking to them, somehow.
That's my case.