Rito Carving in TP?

Originally Posted by smallville boy

WTF???? i only see a piece of ****.

anyways, the rito havent a dragon head, they have a bird head.

The only resembling of the Rito in TP are inside of the shop in ordon villague, we can see some figurines of the rito people in one of the stands.
But is only a cameo, the rito never exists in the child-link time line(OOT-MM-TP), the zora never evolven into the rito in this timeline.

Maybe the dragon resembles the great valoo.its just a cool coincedence.
by the way this is m favorite smiley now----

Two Problems link4life1432
A. The Rito never developed on the Child Timeline (Though I can dream)
B) The Dragon doesn't look like Valoo at all, it is far more similar to Agorok
The Occa theory is more likely as the Occa live near Argorok, and live in a city that is clearly designed for humanoid creatures.

Maybe the suffering in the picture are the Oocca in their normal form?


\w/ LTR \w/

I hope that we can find evidence of the rito in the child timeline. that would prove once and for all that the zoras didn't evolve into the rito. THAT WOULD BE GREAT!!!!

It would really hlep if someone told me why Navi was in TP...

Navi wasn't in TP. A fairy that one guy described unofficially as Navi was in TP purely as a cursor, not as a character. If she was a character that means she was in the Wii version and not the Gamecube version, which makes no sense.

Originally Posted by Reign and Kisiro

It certainly looks like a Rito, but the dragon more resembles Volvagia than Valoo. This is a stretch, but perhaps it's a representation of the Oocoo, and the dragon is Argorok?

Originally Posted by mohammedali

I think the Argorok connections not a bad idea. Maybe the winged creatures are the Oocoo's before they evolved.

Originally Posted by Labrynian Rebel

Maybe it represents Valoo creating the first Rito? For if it is, it's not a stretch that the remaining Zoras who witnessed this historic event would build a monument in memory of it? In this case the Great Bridge of Hylia?

Originally Posted by Veronox

Hmm...could it be that the Rito did in fact exist during TP in an off-map loction?

Quote 1: Definantly not an Oocca, its too humanoid in appearnce. Its a rito

Quote 2: That would mean the Oocca are deevolving, which doesn't make sence

Quote 3: WW happens in a diffrent timeline, there would be no one to know about it in the child timeline

Quote 4: Most pluasible explanation.

I have always disbelieved the Rito/Zora evolution theory, and this find totally blows it appart. If the Zoras evolved into the Rito, then why are there carvings of Rito when Zoras still exist? The answer is the Zoras and Ritos didn't evolve, they are 2 seperate races.

Originally Posted by ShiekahSage

I have always disbelieved the Rito/Zora evolution theory, and this find totally blows it appart. If the Zoras evolved into the Rito, then why are there carvings of Rito when Zoras still exist? The answer is the Zoras and Ritos didn't evolve, they are 2 seperate races.

Nope.

The carve in TP means nothing with the ritos, TP and WW are in difernt timelines.

The Zora/Rito evolution theory have a lot of sence, all the on game evidense confirm that thing.

Originally Posted by smallville boy

Nope.

The carve in TP means nothing with the ritos, TP and WW are in difernt timelines.

The Zora/Rito evolution theory have a lot of sence, all the on game evidense confirm that thing.

If the ritos existed before the split (which they would have if they hadn't evolved from Zoras) then they would exist in both the child and adult timelines. Since we have a picture of a Rito on a bridge that was obviously built after OOT (thus after the split) that would mean the Ritos exist in the child timeline. The only way they could exist in the child timeline is if they hadn't evolved, becuase if they evolved from the zoras they would only be in the adult timeline since hyrule is only flooded in the adult timeline.

Do you understand, or do I need to be even more clear?

from what i gather this carving was made before the flood in either timeline. since the zora evalution theorie says they evolve after the flood it can't be true. the rito and zora are different races.

Originally Posted by ShiekahSage

Do you understand, or do I need to be even more clear?

nOPE, The rito don exists in child timeline,
The rito are the zora evolved all the ingame evidence confirm that.

Originally Posted by smallville boy

nOPE, The rito don exists in child timeline,
The rito are the zora evolved all the ingame evidence confirm that.

If the don't exist in the child timeline then how can there be a carving on a bridge of them in the child timeline?

Originally Posted by ShiekahSage

If the don't exist in the child timeline then how can there be a carving on a bridge of them in the child timeline?

Assuming that's what it is.

this isn't what i think, but mabye the rito evolved into the ooca or vice versa. then the carving would be both.

^ True. It's most likely an easter egg they threw in for a laugh. As developers do

Originally Posted by ShiekahSage

If the don't exist in the child timeline then how can there be a carving on a bridge of them in the child timeline?

We dont know exactly who is the thing in the carving, we don't see a rito,maybe is a oocca in theire previos form.can be alot of things.

Other answer: is only a cameo. like yoshi,mario,etc... cameos in zelda series,a eastern egg.
Nothing with the story of the game.