Time-Line Theory

This is how I think the time-line is going:

First LoZ, then the same Link is in AoL, many years later the ALttP takes events. Then, many more years later, Link begins the big adventure in OoT, continues in MM, then FS, after that TP, here is where I think the story splits up. Link (Still the same) leave Hyrule, and go to OoS and OoA, while Collin (from TP) experience TWW. Meanwhile, Link go to the same sea in LA. At the same time Collin continues to PH. Link go to FSA, and finally Collin go to TMC.

What do you guys think?

I'm sorry, but this has to be one of the strangest, illogical timelines I've seen.

Err.... Where is any evidence to back this up?

Originally Posted by Keaton-King

This is how I think the time-line is going:

First LoZ, then the same Link is in AoL, many years later the ALttP takes events. Then, many more years later, Link begins the big adventure in OoT, continues in MM, then FS, after that TP, here is where I think the story splits up. Link (Still the same) leave Hyrule, and go to OoS and OoA, while Collin (from TP) experience TWW. Meanwhile, Link go to the same sea in LA. At the same time Collin continues to PH. Link go to FSA, and finally Collin go to TMC.

What do you guys think?

It's wrong. The timeframe you have for the whole series is only a few decades. The series takes place over many centuries. Not only that, but look at how you grouped the games:

Oracle of Season/Ages has a Link that is much younger than the one from Twilight Princess.
Twilight Princess's Link cannot be the same as Ocarina of Time's Link because he's never been outside of Ordonia.
Four Swords takes place after Minish Cap, because Minish Cap shows Vaati's origins.
Link from Link to the Past is older than Young Link from Ocarina of Time.
Colin cannot be Wind Waker's Link because he would have memory of Hyrule.

Not to mention that the multiple Link's theory, and the Split timeline theory have been confirmed. That AND it was confirmed that ALttP was confirmed to be betore LoZ and Oot before that. I'm at the risk of flaming like crazy here, but I won't, just don't post anymore timeline theories.

Sorry everyone, my big brother pranked me (Again...). He told me this was true, just to see how long it took me to realice to truth. Thanks everyone for the evidence I needed. Again, sorry! (My brother can be very convincing sometimes...)

^Heh, I just have to ask... how did he convince you that this crazy idea was true?

First he wrote it in wikipedia, then showed it to me, then after convincing me, he deletet it.

Originally Posted by Keaton-King

First he wrote it in Wikipedia, then showed it to me, then after convincing me, he deleted it.

Ingenious. Well, in the future, remember to treat Wikipedia with the same amount of distrust you would have for any other source of information. . . . seriously, though everyone *****es about it being inaccurate, it is just as inaccurate as encyclopedias on the shelves.

The main difference is that you can edit Wikipedia to be better than those shelved encyclopedias. I have faith in mankind, to an extent. I am sure that, for every jackass out there who vandalizes it, there are two jackasses who are hell-bent on keeping Wikipedia utterly serious and factual. ^_^

Originally Posted by HurriPen

Ingenious. Well, in the future, remember to treat Wikipedia with the same amount of distrust you would have for any other source of information. . . . seriously, though everyone *****es about it being inaccurate, it is just as inaccurate as encyclopedias on the shelves.

The main difference is that you can edit Wikipedia to be better than those shelved encyclopedias. I have faith in mankind, to an extent. I am sure that, for every jackass out there who vandalizes it, there are two jackasses who are hell-bent on keeping Wikipedia utterly serious and factual. ^_^

Like me.