Quote:
Originally Posted by LexLionHart Speculation. |
Well, considering that there is no direct statement explaining how Ganondorf/Ganon: King of Evil gains everlasting life, I choose to go with the connotations between Ganondorf's power of darkness and his everlasting life throughout the timeline. As a human, Ganondorf is mortal; as a Demon King, Ganon is immortal.
Quote:
|
Unless, of course, it was tradition. The Sith tradition, in Star Wars, is for the apprentice to ascend to Mastership by killing his master. Something of that sort could easily appear in a Zelda title.
|
It could possibly appear in a Zelda title, but not only is this speculation, I am confident Nintendo is deliberately putting forward the message that the Gerudo tribe in general aren't evil; only Ganondorf (and his devout followers). For example, were the four carpenters murdered on sight when they entered the Fortress? No, they were imprisoned. There are details like this, Nabooru and the "honourable" description in
FSA that are deliberately setting the Gerudo apart from Ganondorf. The Gerudo imprisoned people; Ganondorf "murdered" people.
Quote:
|
The term "boyfriends" suggests no sexual relationship. If it does, Nintendo is eliciting a message to a young audience that premarital sex is okay, which sort of goes against your principle.
|
Just to explain where I stand on this principle (and not to look hypocritical), there is nothing wrong with arguing that a single word/term has been used to hide the true meaning of the sentence in question for the benefit of children. What is wrong is the way that entire events are speculated with the excuse that we do not see them because it would alienate the young audience. There is a clean difference between interpretation and speculation.
You are correct that the term "boyfriends" does not imply an immediate sexual relationship. For this term, and only this term, will I use the argument that the term is used to protect the welfare of children. As adults, we understand that the concept will lead in some respect to a sexual relationship. After all, the Gerudo look down upon all men except Ganondorf, so their willingness to find boyfriends is inconsistent with this impression, unless they were after something important and unrelated to that impression, such as sex for procreation. Without sensible alternatives, this is the logical reception of the message.
Quote:
|
Slippy Toad has a lot of children.
|
So do normal toads. Ever seen the number of eggs that they produce in the wild? This is just a humorous parody of nature.
Quote:
|
How many redheads do you see, outside of the Gerudo?
|
Lol, *counts all the Hylians in the game*.
Question: what are the ratio of Hylian adults to children in
OoT? You argued that we don't see all the Gerudo in the fortress; isn't it obvious that we don't see all the Hylians either? My point is red hair does not necessarily equal Gerudo heritage as long as there is at least one example of a girl with red hair and no Gerudos to give birth to her. Until I see a definite elaboration of the vague concept that it was, I do not accept it for truth in the general timeline.
PS: In response to the above posts, since the Gerudo only giving birth to female Gerudo is unnatural, I interpret the 100 year rule to be exact and unnatural as well. Every 100 years, a Gerudo male is born and "destined" to lead the Gerudo. The inclusion of destiny enforces the concept that it is an unnatural system.