Oh. Well if it's a case of deliberately claiming things contrary to the HH then that's something different.
I can only speak for myself in that many things are just too obscure at this time to be taken properly in terms of what's been translated and the interpretations of them.
In fact, in one thread (they all seem to blur together) someone and myself were debating something, then realised we were actually arguing the same thing, only through different, individual interpretations of the same text.
---------- Post added at 09:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:36 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Window It is indeed wrong to claim that the Historia states that AST and LCT are non-canon, or "not included in the continuity" or something similar.
Still, the word "canon" seems to have no valid usage wihtin the Zelda community. If the theorizing community will treat the information from the Historia as "what is actually relevant and official", then it follows as a consequence that AST and LCT will be excluded from that definition, and thus from the timeline-related theorizing sections. Therefore they will, in practice, be non-canonical (even though they are not).
/Blue Window |
At the end of the day, the players are well entitled to interpret, play around and present the games as they want. It's their right as the audience to be able to make of their beloved series what they will.
While nintendo have stated the official timeline, it does not in any way take away the right of the fans to enjoy the series in any way they want.