|
|||
|
Re: AoL line
By the same reasoning (the idea that Link is the first person to wield the Triforce since the Great King)
can't we conclude that the Great King (Zelda's father) also wrote the scroll? The scroll writer must have had access to the whole Triforce, since he says: Quote:
Quote:
__________________
MC - OoT - WW/PH - ST MC - OoT/MM - TP/LCT - FS/FSA - ALttP/LA - OoX/OoY LoZ/AoL PH does not take place on the Great Sea |

|
||||
|
Re: AoL line
Left isn't necessarily taken as such, no.
I could have left my car at the car park but taken the keys with me- in which case this works and you are correct. I left my friends and their cars at the car park but took my car with me, more suited to the Triforce comment, does not imply that the speaker himself was ever in possession of his friends of their cars, merely knowledgable of their position wherever he 'left' them. It's ambiguous and open to interpretation.
__________________
|

| Advertisement |
|
|||
|
Re: AoL line
So, you think the Triforce was all in Hyrule after the King died, but later on, someone learned
that it could be misused and hid the ToC? I would like to know where you think the Triforce part(s) the Prince couldn't get were if the part(s) in question weren't the ToC hidden in the Great Palace.
__________________
MC - OoT - WW/PH - ST MC - OoT/MM - TP/LCT - FS/FSA - ALttP/LA - OoX/OoY LoZ/AoL PH does not take place on the Great Sea |

|
||||
|
Re: AoL line
I believe the 'only able to inherit it in part' is a sign of the concept of the Triforce splitting- The Prince and/or Wizard would have got Power as is the norm for those seeking it for its glory alone.
Zelda got Wisdom, the Prince and Wizard knew she knew something about the nature/whereabouts of the Triforce- I take this as she had it- also why she survived and the Wizard's spell backfired. Presumably one of the Knights of Hyrule got Courage. This is all in the pre-OoT events. After this the Triforce is locked in the Sacred Realm as it is too dangerous in Hyrule for it. It is reformed by the Ancient Sages upon the Wizard's and the Knights' death and Zelda's coma and sealed with Master Sword and stones. Many many years later and many games later we know Hyrule has knowledge of Power and Wisdom with things referring to 'both Triforces'. These are 'left in the kingdom' by the scroll writer who had hidden the third for the next great King- the first to rule with the Triforce since pre-OoT. This is all in my Theory-fic ![]()
__________________
|

| Advertisement |
|
|||

|
||||
|
Re: AoL line
RZ, the manual says the King hid the Triforce of Courage before his death. The Triforce was already divided before the King died, and thus, the "inherit it in part" can't be a split.
__________________
Voted Most Knowledgeable of Zelda Winter 2008. Voted Most Dedicated Theorist Summer 2009 ![]() |

| Advertisement |
|
||||
|
Re: AoL line
Quote:
__________________
|

|
|||
|
Re: AoL line
Quote:
Quote:
The OoT king had the divine blessing of the Triforce and used that guidance to unite the kingdom of Hyrule, but he died sometime during OoT and his son (Daphnes) could not inherit the full Triforce because it had split. Due to the flood the world entered a state of decline, and Daphnes awaited the appearance of a hero to defeat Ganondorf and restore the Triforce to good hands. He then hid it away until the time that a new great king would come to lead the people to prevent its misuse in the interim, and cast a spell to mark the one who should receive the keys to recover the Triforce of Courage. Quote:
If you believe as I do, it is nigh impossible for the scroll-writer king to be the great-king father of the original Zelda. |

| Advertisement |
|
||||
|
Re: AoL line
Again, I'm certain in my manual (and a scan I've found online) it makes no indication any King wrote the scroll, Zelda's father or otherwise... Am I missing something really obvious?
__________________
|

|
|||
|
Re: AoL line
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|

| Advertisement |
|
|||
|
Re: AoL line
Here we are:
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|

|
||||
|
Re: AoL line
Oh- that?
That's what people are arguing with? "The enemies in the palace are those that were made and chosen by the King." There's nothing in that. Actually nothing. 1) This refers specifically to the first Palace. 2)So what if the King created these enemies- how does that link him to the scroll writer? Because: 3)The Scroll Writer was only said to have set the Great Barrier on the Great Palace- no other guardian or barrier is said to be of his doing. 4)It says the Scroll Writer made use of these labyrinths, but no reason they couldn't already have been there by a King- Ganon used the twisty corridors and puzzles of the Earth Temple to prevent the Hero fixing the MS, but it was already there previously for less sinister reasons. Palace/Dungeon/Temple purposes can be altered. The Temples in OoT are the best use of this- Evil maze or place of worship? Depends who was there last. So far as I'm concerned the ancient King (Zelda I's dad), the Scroll Writer and the King who created the enemies could be three entirely separate people separated by milennia each way. Occam's Razor wouldn't like it, but it's entirely possible even in the NoA translation without any word games.
__________________
|

| Advertisement |
|
|||
|
Re: AoL line
Quote:
Quote:
If you're like me and you take complementary versions of the manual as equally canon, this would mean that the scroll writer = the king. |

|
||||
|
Re: AoL line
Mine doesn't say that... Is that the story at the beginning with the scroll being given or is it elsewhere?
Quote:
Quote:
I have no problem with the scroll-writer being a King, but I don't know what labels him so in any translation.
__________________
|

| Advertisement |
|
|||
|
Re: AoL line
Quote:
Part 1 Part 2 |

|
||||
|
Re: AoL line
Ah... That explains it. The GBA manuals are very different in Europe- more akin to the GBA aLttP edit. Both LoZ and AoL have only page-long histories with minimal details. Then again we've got to fit like eight languages in one manual so ours was probably cut down for practical reasons rather than storyline intention.
Interesting in spite of the new translation it's still 'world of evil' for Makai and not 'Dark World' as it is translated everywhere else... they still separate it- strange.
__________________
|

| Advertisement |
|
|||
|
Re: AoL line
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|

|
||||
|
Re: AoL line
Then it's settled!
Tea and crumpets all round ![]()
__________________
|

| Advertisement |
|
|||
|
Re: AoL line
Quote:
the Sages' seal to weaken allowing Ganon to return. I am sure Daphnes was the King when Ganon returned, thus his regret that his kingdom was sealed away. Daphnes can't be OoT' King's son. Daphnes really can't be the OoT King's son when you consider that Zelda has no brother, yet on the AT the King was killed when Zelda was still a child... so how could the OoT King have fathered a son after he died? No, no no. Daphnes has to be descended from OoT Zelda, and not the OoT King. Remember the AT ending? If Daphnes was the OoT's King's son, he obviously did not survive Ganon's attack, or else he would have been around with Adult Zelda, but he wasn't. He would've had to have been OoT Zelda's brother, but died while Zelda was still a child. This means Daphnes was killed during Ganon's attack, which means that Daphnes was never the King for even a split-second... Daphnes cannot = OoT King's son. Simply impossible.
__________________
MC - OoT - WW/PH - ST MC - OoT/MM - TP/LCT - FS/FSA - ALttP/LA - OoX/OoY LoZ/AoL PH does not take place on the Great Sea |

|
|||
|
Re: AoL line
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I deduce Daphnes as OoT Zelda's brother for two reasons: 1) He doesn't seem to be her father; 2) As I stated before, it doesn't appear that more than a generation passed between OoT and the flood |

| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Tags |
| aol, line |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|