Timelines: Is there even an Adult and Child Timeline?

Ah, yes, like an "alternate sequel" typed thing... I remember.

btw: who said that "alternate sequel" thing? Was it you xoɹǝpnpɐpןǝz, or was it ojlink9? I can't remember.

But, yes, if you're going with an (unproven, might i add) alternate sequel thing, then good job!

EDIT: Whoa, why is one of the tags for this discussion "zeldaduderox is sexy"?

^Because I am.

Originally Posted by xoɹǝpnpɐpןǝz

Everything is good now,

oh, and that is now my timeline I'll be using. The:

.........--MM--TP--LoZ--AoL
OoT
.........--MM--WW--PH--OoX--MC--FS/FSA--ALttP--LA

Oh, and


You're saying that because you think Ganon is killed in TP? Play the game again, Ganondorf is killed in TP. Ganon still remains.

I actually thing Ganon and Ganondorf are the same person, remember in ALttP, one of the maidens said "Ganon used to be known as a gerudo theif named Ganondorf".

There still needs to be some enlightenment on "Prince Ganon" though.

I don't think he died in TP, but at the same time, I think it may be possible. More undecided, the way he talks hints at he's not done.

Ganondorf, (the poser he is) bought a halloween costume and called himself Ganon.

No, that's not the reason. But they are two different people. And that quote you said, Ganon use to be known as Ganondorf just further proves my theory.

^Because I am.

Blasphemy! I need proof and not the suckish proof you're giving me now!
I need quotes from the games, developers, manuals! I need screenshots! I need proof! Proof! Proof!!!

On topic: Ganon/dorf could be the same person, but there may be two anyways.

Originally Posted by xoɹǝpnpɐpןǝz

Ganondorf, (the poser he is) bought a halloween costume and called himself Ganon.

No, that's not the reason. But they are two different people. And that quote you said, Ganon use to be known as Ganondorf just further proves my theory.

He changed to Ganon only after he was transformed into a beast. Saying USED to only means he's the same guy.

I like how you're thinking though, there is 2 different Ganon's due to the whole "Prince (Zelda's Brother) Ganon". I just watched the ending of TP, and with that plus developer's statements means he's undecided if he was killed or not. The problem with him being killed is he's already killed Zelda I (which I think is probable to just be Prince Ganon, and the backstory well enough explains how he got there), and ALttP, meaning TP and ALttP need to opposite eachother on the timeline, proving ALttP on the adult side theory.

And so that's why you made the thread ALttP backstory?

Originally Posted by xoɹǝpnpɐpןǝz

And so that's why you made the thread ALttP backstory?

No I didn't??????

I responded on it, never made it.

Originally Posted by xoɹǝpnpɐpןǝz
And so that's why you made the thread ALttP backstory?

No that was me.

Originally Posted by Watties
The problem with him being killed is he's already killed Zelda I (which I think is probable to just be Prince Ganon, and the backstory well enough explains how he got there), and ALttP, meaning TP and ALttP need to opposite eachother on the timeline, proving ALttP on the adult side theory.

What? I don't understand one word of what you're saying. Explain better, please.

Seriously.

Originally Posted by Watties

He changed to Ganon only after he was transformed into a beast. Saying USED to only means he's the same guy.

He is the same guy. Ganondorf became Ganon using the Triforce of Power in OoT and a different Ganondorf became Ganon using the Trident in FSA. Ganondorf to Ganon is like Link to Wolf Link.

I like how you're thinking though, there is 2 different Ganon's due to the whole "Prince (Zelda's Brother) Ganon".

Zelda's WHAT???

I just watched the ending of TP, and with that plus developer's statements means he's undecided if he was killed or not.

He died.

The problem with him being killed is he's already killed Zelda I (which I think is probable to just be Prince Ganon, and the backstory well enough explains how he got there), and ALttP, meaning TP and ALttP need to opposite eachother on the timeline, proving ALttP on the adult side theory.

Just because Ganondof died in TP doesn't mean he can't come back in ALttP. Don't forget that he died in WW too. This is why FSA is placed after either TP or after WW/PH. It's to explain how Ganondorf comes back after dying. For example:

Ganon 1: OoT - TP Ganon 2: FSA - ALttP

Thus making a good timeline like this:

CT: OoT/MM - TP - FS/FSA - ALttP

And that brings us back to:

.........--MM--TP--LoZ--AoL
OoT
.........--MM--WW--PH--OoX--ALttP--LA

Originally Posted by xoɹǝpnpɐpןǝz

And that brings us back to:

.........--MM--TP--LoZ--AoL
OoT
.........--MM--WW--PH--OoX--ALttP--LA

LOZ/AOL and ALttP have to placed on the same side of the timeline. "Link and Zelda's Ancestors". And though Nintendo corrected it to saying that "ALttP comes after LOZ".

Originally Posted by Watties

LOZ/AOL and ALttP have to placed on the same side of the timeline. "Link and Zelda's Ancestors". And though Nintendo corrected it to saying that "ALttP comes after LOZ".

That was before the split. It really doesn't have to.

Originally Posted by Triforce of the Gods

That was before the split. It really doesn't have to.

What about the Zora's... Hold that thought, making a thread.

Originally Posted by Beemnorv
Zelda's WHAT???

Watties has this theory that the Sleeping Zelda's brother, after obtaining his single Triforce piece, became Ganon.

Originally Posted by xoɹǝpnpɐpןǝz
And that brings us back to:

.........--MM--TP--LoZ--AoL
OoT
.........--MM--WW--PH--OoX--ALttP--LA

You don't even have the Four Swords sub-series on your timeline...

And no one ever tried to explain this mess of words:

Originally Posted by Watties
The problem with him being killed is he's already killed Zelda I (which I think is probable to just be Prince Ganon, and the backstory well enough explains how he got there), and ALttP, meaning TP and ALttP need to opposite eachother on the timeline, proving ALttP on the adult side theory.

Originally Posted by xoɹǝpnpɐpןǝz
And that brings us back to:

.........--MM--TP--LoZ--AoL
OoT
.........--MM--WW--PH--OoX--ALttP--LA

Explain LoZ/AoL on the CT with the Sage Name towns and watery empire.

Explain Twinrova in OoX on the AT.

Explain the Master Sword and Triforce legend on the AT.

And, finally, to iterate the above poster, where is the FS series?

Firstly, it's not a CT. It's just a alternate branch type thing.

Secondly, same reason applies for OoX on the AT.

Thirdly, same reason applies as the one above.

Fourthly, I forgot to add it. I meant to say:

.........--MM--TP--LoZ--AoL
OoT
.........--MM--WW--PH--OoX--FS/FSA--ALttP--LA

You don't have to be so critical. It's just a possibility, Beemnorv showed me the way. And the way is that you should accept it as a valid possibility, which it does have.

Originally Posted by xoɹǝpnpɐpןǝz

And that brings us back to:

.........--MM--TP--LoZ--AoL
OoT
.........--MM--WW--PH--OoX--ALttP--LA

Yeahno.

Why do you have MM on the AT and LoZ/AoL on the CT?

Why are there Zora on the AT?
confused by your own theory?

Have you been listening to any of this thread at all?

Firstly, neither of those branches are the adult timeline or the child timeline. It's just an alternate splitting after OoT.