The LA debate

Also, retcons do not screwing everything over. Maintaining old canon in spite of retcons does.

This. God I might sig that.

Originally Posted by Slagr

LttP-LA was never confirmed. The only thing that is required for LA was a dead Ganon, so AoL works just as well also. Everyone thought LttP was the prequel because of the specific references in LA, of which there are more in OoX. It seems pretty obvious what is currently intended.

Also, retcons do not screwing everything over. Maintaining old canon in spite of retcons does.

"Maintaining" For all we know, 3 years a Zelda game comes out which ****s over the split. Face it, they keep changing there minds. Fine, OOX leads to LA (right now) but who knows. And before, due to in game evidence, it WAS ALttP, it has changed.GG.

And current intentions don't make it right.

Face it, they keep changing there minds.

Don't base your timeline off of what the developers might do in the future. The timeline is meant to be what you think is the developers current intent.

And current intentions don't make it right.

Current intentions make it correct right now, which is all that matters at this point.

Originally Posted by Table

Don't base your timeline off of what the developers might do in the future. The timeline is meant to be what you think is the developers current intent. Current intentions make it correct right now, which is all that matters at this point.

The developer's don't know what the **** they're doing right now, they have a lot to sort out.

I'm gonna base my timeline off what I think is right, not off intent, or how YOU follow the croud instead of putting any origonality into it.

Originally Posted by Watties

"Maintaining" For all we know, 3 years a Zelda game comes out which ****s over the split.

True, but I doubt it. If that does happen, then recent=right.

Face it, they keep changing their minds.

that's because they are making it up as they go. It's not a crime.

Fine, OOX leads to LA (right now) but who knows. And before, due to in game evidence, it WAS ALttP, it has changed.GG.

true.

And current intentions don't make it right.

actually, that's exactly what makes it right.

sigh..this is so confusing...OoX-LA or ALttP-OoX-LA or ALttP-AL
so far I'm likeing the ALttP-OoX-LA just cause it takes those games out of the ****ing way...

I'm gonna base my timeline off what I think is right, not off intent, or how YOU follow the croud instead of putting any origonality into it.

Originality doesn't make a difference if your timeline sucks. Tell me, what makes the split confirmed? The Legend of the Fairy sure makes the split make no sense. It's correct because the developers say it is confirmed.

Originally Posted by Slagr

True, but I doubt it. If that does happen, then recent=right.



that's because they are making it up as they go. It's not a crime.



true.



actually, that's exactly what makes it right.

especially when it dosen't make sense

Originally Posted by Slagr
LttP-LA was never confirmed. The only thing that is required for LA was a dead Ganon, so AoL works just as well also. Everyone thought LttP was the prequel because of the specific references in LA, of which there are more in OoX. It seems pretty obvious what is currently intended.

Also, retcons do not screwing everything over. Maintaining old canon in spite of retcons does.

I Keep reading that assertion. Can you provide Proof? like, at least three references that can overshadow Nightmare Agahnim. thnx

Originally Posted by Ojlink9

I Keep reading that assertion. Can you provide Proof? like, at least three references that can overshadow Nightmare Agahnim. thnx

Read the thread.

Originally Posted by Table

Originality doesn't make a difference if your timeline sucks. Tell me, what makes the split confirmed? The Legend of the Fairy sure makes the split make no sense. It's correct because the developers say it is confirmed.

The reason why your timeline sucks and most of them do is because they're following the developers which you have just said makes no sense. If you're gonna let them just walk all over you, then don't theorize, because everything they said you're restating. The point of this is to come up with something that is right, and sense they don't know, there is no point in sucking them off every time.

I Keep reading that assertion. Can you provide Proof? like, at least three references that can overshadow Nightmare Agahnim. thnx

Agahnim may have appeared in OoS. Blaino is ONLY in OoX and LA. Along with the Angler Fish (actually the Angler Fish of OoA looks completely different than the one of LA, but it looks identical to an Angler Fry from LA, just bigger), along with like 11 more enemies that only appear in OoX and LA. That overshadows the 5 enemies for LttP/LA, I'd say. If they matter, anyway.

Why did they make the ending of OoX set up LA perfectly?

The reason why your timeline sucks

Tell me, what's my timeline?

The point of this is to come up with something that is right, and sense they don't know, there is no point in sucking them off every time.

So we're NOT trying to find the official timeline?

Originally Posted by Table

Agahnim may have appeared in OoS. Blaino is ONLY in OoX and LA. Along with the Angler Fish (actually the Angler Fish of OoA looks completely different than the one of LA, but it looks identical to an Angler Fry from LA, just bigger), along with like 11 more enemies that only appear in OoX and LA. That overshadows the 5 enemies for LttP/LA, I'd say. If they matter, anyway.

Why did they make the ending of OoX set up LA perfectly? Tell me, what's my timeline? So we're NOT trying to find the official timeline?

We're trying to find the official timeline, which is something they don't even know yet, which is my point. They follow when a big theory comes out and then they approve it, they don't have anything, it is based on us to prove it ourselves, then they may or may not make a timeline. Called a scheme to keep the series alive while they jerk off.

Originally Posted by Slagr

Read the thread.

I Find absolutely no reason to arbitrarily accept that OoX's Link is the LA Link; Different Age, Different Attire, Different Memories (one which supplies the end boss) and yada yada. ALttP's Link must be a certain age so he can wield the Master Sword... wait... no...
d*** it, wats up with WW's Link??? any one care to theorize why he is able to weild the Master Sword??? or is it possible that he was as old as TP's Link and OoT's Link... any thoughts?

Originally Posted by Ojlink9

I Find absolutely no reason to arbitrarily accept that OoX's Link is the LA Link; Different Age, Different Attire, Different Memories (one which supplies the end boss) and yada yada. ALttP's Link must be a certain age so he can wield the Master Sword... wait... no...
d*** it, wats up with WW's Link??? any one care to theorize why he is able to weild the Master Sword??? or is it possible that he was as old as TP's Link and OoT's Link... any thoughts?

Make a thread on a question as big as that. As far as my answer, I always found it as a place where Nintendo screwed up. Or the gods were so desperate they let a kiddie wield it.

makes sence :\

If my timeline sucks, then tell me what my timeline is.

If the developers say that in the official timeline there will be a split, then there will be a split until something more recent comes along saying that's untrue.

If the developers say that LoZ/AoL goes after TWW/PH then it does until something more recent comes along saying it's untrue.

Who would make the official timeline? Aonuma, most likely. If Aonuma says that something happens in the timeline, then it does.

That's just the way it is.

I Find absolutely no reason to arbitrarily accept that OoX's Link is the LA Link; Different Age, Different Attire, Different Memories (one which supplies the end boss)

If LA takes place after OoX then of course he'd be older in LA.

GBA LttP has the exact same art style as OoX. By your logic LA can't go after LttP, then, right?

Isn't the nightmare the reason for all the enemies and bosses? Well OoX/LA has more of those...

Originally Posted by Table

Agahnim may have appeared in OoS. Blaino is ONLY in OoX and LA. Along with the Angler Fish (actually the Angler Fish of OoA looks completely different than the one of LA, but it looks identical to an Angler Fry from LA, just bigger), along with like 11 more enemies that only appear in OoX and LA. That overshadows the 5 enemies for LttP/LA, I'd say. If they matter, anyway.

Why did they make the ending of OoX set up LA perfectly? Tell me, what's my timeline? So we're NOT trying to find the official timeline?

11 To 5 is pretty steep, but do they top the bosses? i mean moblins from wind waker show up in Minish Cap; people need to accept that the small enemies dont really matter. its the big ones that moves the story along.

^Gimme a minute to list the bosses. There are more for OoX/LA, IIRC.

Angler Fish, Blaino, Facade, Giant Ghini (they look a little different between the two games; so this one is kinda meh), Smasher, and Vire (boss form). Compared to LttP/LAs: Lanmola (boss form), Moldorm (boss form), and Agahnim (which may appeared in OoS)

That's only counting the ones exclusive to those games. Even if you count everything, including non-exclusives, OoX/LA has more.

By the way, Holodrum looks eerily similar to Koholint, IIRC.

ok now im starting to think it goes OoX - ALttP - LA because I read that in OoX twinrova try to revive Ganon , which would make sence since he is dead in TP..

MM - TP (Ganon dies) - OoX (revivng ganon) - LA (idk if ganon is in this game)