Quote:
Originally Posted by Yami
And for your second question, sort of. It won't be exact, as you cannot remember how everything is, right? I can't remember how my desktop icons are everytime I shuffle them about, so if you're going to order those parts, I suggest buying a 100-200GB hard drive as well just to back up stuff. Then when you restore your stuff, you have a load of spare storage on your comp too. : ) |
Well wouldn't that be nice. But unfortunately, getting another 2 sticks of memory runs me up another $110, making this situation a bit more expensive than I was looking for. I'm thinking then that I might buy the parts over time. Get the Mobo, get the Memory, then get the processor eventually, and last, as it probably will have dropped a bit in price by then if all goes my way. That or it might be a whole different type of CPU going into that slot other than a X2. But with prices, that's unlikely.
What I was going to do was buy the Mother Board and CPU, live with that for a while, then slowly start to replace the parts in my system, one by one, as money comes along, until I pretty much have a completely new system. (Starting with a DirectX 10 GPU, then memory, then the HDD.) Now that's screwed up a bit, of course. I also need to be putting away money for saving, and anything over $250 shouldn't really be in the cards already with all the games and the Wii coming out this fall, not to mention other expenses.
Do we know if DDR2 and the other prices are expected to fall in the near future?
Edit: RAM
That's the RAM I've been looking at. I know the Latency is bad, but is that such a big deal? I mean, it's already DDR2 and a high speed at that. Plus, it seems all the other higher latency DDR2 RAM have problems with AM2 boards, while this pair doesn't.
Anyways, for a dual core computing, is it still better to have two seperate sticks of 512 RAM instead of one single 1GB stick of RAM? DDR2 is "Dual Channel", so I thought maybe that has something to do with multiple cores running, but I also thought two seperate sticks would be better so that each core could use it's own full 512MB stick. Is any of that logic right, here?
And I know 1GB is pretty low for RAM amounts for Vista, but it'll have to do. I'm on a budget here, and this whole thing is a work in progress. Maybe after I get the video card and Vista, then I'll eventually grab another Gig or two for RAM. But I also plan on my new GPU having at least 256MB of V-RAM, so that'll take a little bit of pressure off the main RAM. Running XP though, I have yet to reach a situation where I'm using all of my current 1GB of memory at once. I don't game much on PC, so I've never really needed a huge access amount of it. The worst I do is Photoshop, while online, with AIM open.