Quote:
Originally Posted by Andross so yeah on PlentyOfFish.com, which is this online dating site, whenever you message a woman you're presented with "top ten least favorite topics for women"
among them are politics, science, and science-fiction |
Okay, so first of all, it would be interesting to see where this data comes from, and what sort of questions were asked. it makes a difference whether women were explicitly asked "what is your least favorite thing to talk about" or whether men and women were explicitly asked "what is your favorite thing to talk about?" and then the frequency of certain key words was measured in mens' lists against what was measured in womens' lists; in other words, if it is proportional based on gender.
in the second case, it would less be "women do not like to talk about science" and more likely be "women did not put science on a list of things they would want to talk about." for instance, I probably would not put "real estate" on a list of things I would like to talk about, but that does not mean that I do not want to talk to you about real estate.
so before we can make implications about the statistics, it's important to know what the questions asked were.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andross not only is it stupidly stereotyping an entire sex, I have too much faith in humanity to think that half of the world's population doesn't give a rat's ass about politics and science, the two things that shape our world, our lifestyles, and our futures moreso than anything else |
"not wanting to talk about something on a date or in the in-site chatbox" does not necessarily mean I don't give a rat's ass about a topic.
while I can't account for science fiction, politics and science can be hot-button issues and sources for disagreement. I don't really want to talk about whether or not 9/11 was an inside job over dinner, and the scientific implications of releasing the data on the deadly super-transmittable avian flu strain is not exactly what I would consider pillow talk. talking about these things on dates can be unbelievable tiresome, and moreso if you're just getting to know the person. small differences in opinion can be alienating.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andross (now I'm not talking about being heavily knowledgeable about politics and science, but at least being up-to-date with what's going on in the world; if you don't care about what's going on in the world, you really have no place in it, do you?) |
this is more of a subjective question than anything, actually, and don't take for granted that everyone will believe you. some would say that happiness and wisdom are only attainable when you divorce yourself from the average goings on of the day to say. if someone isolates him or herself in a cabin and lives at peace with nature, avoiding the newspapers, I don't really have a problem with it. people can be as worldly as they want. the world is very big, and trying to fit it all into your head: all the enormity in pain and genocide, all the infinity that life has to offer, can be burdensome, possibly unnecessarily so. life is eating, sleeping, and sometimes ♥♥♥♥ing. it can be as complicated or as simple as you want to make it, and some people prefer the simple.
this might be horribly controversial of me to say, but if you want to be ignorant of world events, as long as you're not in office, teaching my children or planning on blowing anyone up, I won't stop you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apple Jack It may also be that women are taught that science is moreso "man's territory" and that they should focus more on being pretty than being educated. |
Ugh, I can't believe I'm getting into this topic about gendering, but here we go:
First and foremost I'm going to say while I believe educational gendering exists, you're misrepresenting it and probably overstating it. Science/technology/whatever is generally more populated by men, but I think this has less to do with society screaming at women to "GO HOME AND RAISE THE KIDS, SCIENCE IS FOR MEN WITH BRAINS" and is more related to far subtler influences of gendering.
Second of all, while the first part of your statement kind of has a grain of truth to it, the second does not.
Women are getting college educations;
women are getting college educations more than men are this year, for the first time ever. I don't know where you're getting the "they should focus more on being pretty than being educated" because access to higher education has been pretty much the greatest victory for the feminist movement in the last two decades. society is not telling us that it's more important to be pretty than to be smart: society is telling us to be smart! finally! go society! etc.