OoT vs MM: which is better?

Vote here, and don't make any other topics on the subject. If you wish to discuss this, do so here.

Ocarina of Time. In my opinion, Majora's Mask had more depth with all of the sidequests..but Ocarina of Time just seemed to be much bigger, more enjoyable, larger..I guess that's it. o_O

They're both good in different ways.

OOT had a longer story, more temples/dungeons and had a few more places to explore.

MM had more character depth, slightly better graphics and an original storyline.

My overall vote goes to OOT though since I enjoyed that a lot more.

They are both phenominal games in my mind, I loved them both greatly, the only reason I preordered TWW was to get OoT again, and the only reason I got the Collector's Edition was for MM. But OoT was still better than MM, it had a greater effect on me, it is the greatest game ever made.

I think OoT is way better. I liked the story better, the medieval feeling was awesome also, and the overworld was beautiful. OoT is pure Zelda. Majora's Mask was good and all, but it had an uncomfortable feeling of unzeldaishness, if I may use the word.

Originally Posted by Zelda the one

I think OoT is way better. I liked the story better, the medieval feeling was awesome also, and the overworld was beautiful. OoT is pure Zelda. Majora's Mask was good and all, but it had an uncomfortable feeling of unzeldaishness, if I may use the word.

Ocarina of Time, pure Zelda? I wouldn't say that. It seemed to trail off from the roots of The Legend of Zelda. The Wind Waker started to lead it back on track.

Majora's Mask was better imo. Better and original storyline, great gameplay features, practically all around better in my mind.

I loved how it went pretty deep in the plot. Not just the plot but character growth as well.
Besides... It has Oni-Link, and everyone knows Oni-Link is the best alter-ego form.
OoT is good as well, but I liked it for more of the dungons, and dungons, and dungons... oh and Epona!

...im torn between my love for mindless slaughter of monsters, and my love for plots.

OoT is so much better!!!!!mm was good but it as confusingO,o beside the fact my oot has sumthin wrong with it and my mm doesnt it was so much better.
(my oot keeps erasing my file everytime i almost finish ganons tower 40% of the time it erases it by glitching)i have beaten it 11 times though

OOT was betterer
shall i say
it was just i dunno "Comfy"
in MM the moon was gonna crush you in 72 hours and then its freakin armageddon
even though both games kicked serious @$$ OOT was better

Oot was way better. It was longer, more challenging and they tied up more of the loose ends.

Extremely difficult to decide on which is my favourite, for now i have decided that i like them both equally.

I like Majora's Mask better. It was the perfect difficulty and the mask system was awesome. You could fight with 5 diffrent Links!

Bleh, I'd have to say I really prefered OoT over MM.. If it weren't for the three day time limit, maybe I'd consider both to be....almost even.. But, I'm terrible at timed games, and I usually end up goofing around or exploring random places in Zelda games, so..it never worked out for me. xD Heck, I gave up after I got the Goron Mask, and never played it again.. O_o

Me = Weakling.. ;_;

OoT had a better storyline, and there wasn't a time limit hanging over your neck the whole time. That really annoys me. There just seems more of a story with OoT.

I really like MM better, I don't why exactly, but it had something, that OoT didn't. Maybe it was the time limit, the thrill of finishing something quickly. Or the charcter interaction, sure OoT had it, but not to the extent of MM. I do know MM only had about 5 dungeons, I count all the mini dungeons in the moon, the moon dungeon. Anyway, those four dungeons, could have equalled about 5 or 6 dungeons in OoT, because some of them were short, to me anyway. All in all, I like MM better

I believe that OoT was better, although MM came pretty darn close. The levels and items in OoT were better (Hookshot in MM looked really wierd) and there was more of Hyrule to explore. MM got kinda annoying whenever you'd restart the day and no one would remember you and you'd have to go do EVERYTHING over again. There just wasn't enough time. For me, a zelda game is exploring every bit of it - even in dungeons. You couldn't do that in MM. Also, it felt strange to me that Epona was the only REAL horse in MM (the gormon brothers were riding what looked like donkeys.)

I really liked the masks in MM, and if it weren't for the time limit (and the fact that the zora temple is REALLY hard), I'd say the games came about even. Although I did buy Collector's Edition mainly for MM. lol!

OoT & MM were too very awesome games, MM provided the more elaborate sidequests, and had an ordinal storyline and the mask system was the main plus, it had better graphics and character design, as for OoT it had a massive plot evolving around other plots which became a part of the main if you know what I mean, and it was longer, so in conclusion OoT it has to be but the new LoZ GCN will totally obliterate all games and bring them soaring to there knees, Nintendo will show all of the other game companys how to make a great adventure and boy will they praise

OoT is well better than MM. The music and game play is just so much more enjoyable plus it sticks to Ganon and not Majora which I prefer anyw