awwwww.....

it's otay Bryan.

I love imaginary philosophers.
however, I must confess that I much prefer imaginary logicians.

http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~norman/J...Professor.html

it never makes sense to personify that which is not human.

firstly because: that's the nature of personification. identifying qualitative attributes to that which arguably should not be qualified in the first place.

secondly because: humans are not logical creatures to begin with, thus to attribute either behavioral, philosophical, or predictive characteristics upon anything that is not human is to make it "illogical" in ones mind.

thirdly: because we are empirically incapable of perceiving and acknowledging anything that remotely "resembles" god the father, as is sometimes described by western theosophist.

two things that continue to intrigue me:

the first paradigm
the unmoved mover

not argument.

logical thinking.

:3

but now I forgot the question. =B

crap what was i going to request........
poop.
oh I was going to have you maybe help me check some logical jumps in a recent post, if you find that agreeable.
I'm not sure if it made sense or not (it was kinda a brain-vomit type post.)

actually I have a question and a request, to be precise.

I like your new custom rank.

:3

Would you mind if I ask you a question?

good morning Mr. Pie.