Your message was welcome not because it was hostile, but because your position stems from my rather hostile approach. Remember, my "animus" is still the circle in which I bound you. Please enlighten me, then, what is it that makes the "debate" my "mind game" that is terribly, terribly wrong?
Well, Wittgenstein and Margolis will probably save me here, although if I'm cornered I'll tell you I'm a spiritual solipsist. And because you know how much I appreciate animosity, your message was a welcome one. I don't think I can follow, but why would I tell you there was a mind game if there wasn't one?