Which one's better, Ages or Seasons

I think ages has a better storyline, but seasons was harder for me.

Mmmm...I think this discussion would be better off in here:

Best Handheld Zelda.

I think Ages was harder, I can't really choose which is better, but seasons was my first of the two so I like seasons best.

season's boss was the hardest part, and i didn't like when you had to sneak around to get your roc's feather back.

im playing through ages for the first time right now and am really really enjoying the amount of puzzles compared to seasons, so im gonna go with ages

I remember playing those back then. I have a GBA/GBC Cheat book in front of me with all the stuff you can get from it. Hmmmmm...
I think it's alot like the alternate Pokemon games: Although it has it's different items and color, it's pretty much the same thing.

I started playing Ages first after getting half way through I switched to playing Seasons. I can't seem to remember what it was about Ages that made me quite and start Seasons instead?

So I'd have to say I like Seasons better. To me it just seems more original. I can think of several games that have used the going back and forth though time scenario. But I can't think of any other game that uses changing the seasons.

The only thing is I can't seem to defeat the last boss, I usually get to within a couple of hits of defeating him before I get wiped out by the stupid fire balls he spits at you.

ages because u got to travel in time!!!o_O

havent played either one of them.

I prefer Ages, only because I've completed the whole thing, I can't be bothered doing Seasons, I'm lost on it anyway, can't remember what dungeon I'm on. I think it's the 5th one.

Ages is my preferred game. At the time of its release, I was hungry for some more of that style gameplay, the whole "two worlds" thing, like with Alttp and OoT. I think I actually enjoyed Seasons' puzzles more, but Ages more overall.

Seasons, by a mile, maybe a mile and a half. I almost outright disliked Ages (which is saying a lot for a Zelda game). Ages definitely had the better storyline and characters, but other than that, the game was just irritating. Then again, I'm not big on puzzles, so I was kinda screwzord on that front. Meanwhile, with Seasons, you have all four seasons to mess around in (as opposed to just two ages--which more often than not would dump stuck in a wall and you'd have to repeat the animatic all over again), the bosses were interesting and challenging upgrades of their Zelda 1 counterparts, and the music was a bit better too.

Originally Posted by ~~Dark Link~~

I think Ages was harder, I can't really choose which is better, but seasons was my first of the two so I like seasons best.

Same. I got seasons for christmass along time ago. Memories.

I found Ages harder and the bosses were new but in seasons they just reused old ones. I wish I knew my copy of the games where because I kidda want to play them no I've read this thread but I can't find them.

Originally Posted by Darknut King

Ages is my preferred game. At the time of its release, I was hungry for some more of that style gameplay, the whole "two worlds" thing, like with Alttp and OoT. I think I actually enjoyed Seasons' puzzles more, but Ages more overall.

I prefer ages for that reason
I think OoS and OoA were my first Zelda games come to think of it