Timeline theories are stupid.

You know when you think you made the perfect timeline that would explain everything, but Nintendo then makes a new Zelda game and screws up the timeline you worked so hard on. Or there was one Zelda game that you didn't really ad to your timeline, and if you added it it wouldn't fit. What I'm trying to say is that no one can make a timeline untill the series stops and that person beat every single Zelda game.

Errrmmm...and the point of this thread is? People WILL keep making timelines in order to make any sense of the LOZ series. Its almost impossible to keep a new timeline from emerging. Who knows, maybe in the future we will finally see a timeline that works.

P.S. Anyways, I don't think that anyone here will ever want the series to end

It's perfectly possible to make one, and the generally accepted one makes perfect sense. If a new game happens it jsut gets added in whereevr the evidence points best. Dates are soemhting completely out of the question but the order that the stories occur in isn't all that hard to put together.

We make timeline theories because its fun. We have nothing better to do than sit around and theorize. If you don't want to participate in timeline theories, you don't have to, but you don't have to bag on people that do.

Okay, let's not fight here. Everyone has a right to have an opinion. The zelda series is a pandoras box to the gaming organization. People with nothing better to do may enjoy making timelines. I think that's fun but i never really go into it much because i know i won't be right. Others get too serious about it and get a little carried away.

It's best to be moderate in situations such as these, and involving pretty much everything else in life.