Whats the better Nintendo series?

Mario. ****load more games, lots of different game types, Zelda is just RPGs. I love Zelda and all, but yeah, Mario > Zelda.

Isn't Zelda an adventure game?

Originally Posted by DrZaius1

Oh, so you don't like quality? Quality games are bad, apparently. Who cares about quality? Quality is overrated. We should all play unpolished, half-assed games.

How did you survive the 8-bit era? Games are about having FUN. If you have fun playing a game, nothing else about it should matter...

Sounds like your playing games for the wrong reasons.



Also, NES, still have one, still play it. Course, now VC is replacing it, but they still don't have my library.

Originally Posted by Mafoofoo

Uh no. It's the worst idea for a Starfox game. I expect Starfox to fly around shooting **** while only staying in an Arwing. Not galabanting around with some dinosaurs. Shouldn't have even made it past the conceptual stage. Nintendo was on crack when they made Adventures.

Uh, yes. I found Sauria to be a great place to stage a Star Fox game. It was great to let Fox finally get the chance to get out of the cockpit for a while and stretch his legs. It also improved on Fox, making him more of a dynamic character in the franchise. Sauria was beautiful, and Nintendo/Rare pulled it off quite nicely. I'm hoping that we'll be graced with another Star Fox Adventures some day.

Sorry, but I agree with Mafoofoo- Star Fox Adventures was painful.

To each, his own.

It's too bad you can't maintain that mentality in other threads, namely Lucario replacing Mewtwo in Brawl. : /

Originally Posted by sugarpoultry

How did you survive the 8-bit era? Games are about having FUN. If you have fun playing a game, nothing else about it should matter...

Sounds like your playing games for the wrong reasons.



Also, NES, still have one, still play it. Course, now VC is replacing it, but they still don't have my library.

The Legend Of Zelda, Super Mario Bros, Duck Hunt.... All quality NES games. I wasn't even alive when the NES was around, so I don't have the most experience with the system, but "fun" and "quality" are basically the same thing.

Originally Posted by Kit

It's too bad you can't maintain that mentality in other threads, namely Lucario replacing Mewtwo in Brawl. : /

I do have that mentality. Preach to all those for jumping me for daring to think that Mewtwo is better.

Originally Posted by Ender

so I don't have the most experience with the system, but "fun" and "quality" are basically the same thing.

"Quality" is in the eye of the beholder.

Originally Posted by Blizzaga

I do have that mentality. Preach to all those for jumping me for daring to think that Mewtwo is better.

"Think" and "state" are two completely different things.

Originally Posted by Blizzaga

"Quality" is in the eye of the beholder.

Not really. Even if I don't like a game (Lets take Brawl for example) I can still admit that its a very high quality game.

I think:
Mario is cool, but there are waaaaaaaaaaaay too many Spinoffs, and only a couple Spinoff series are Good,
Zelda was ruined by The Minish Cap, and a few other "Disgraces."

But Both are even in My opinion

Originally Posted by Kit

"Think" and "state" are two completely different things.

I'm sorry. Why are you spamming again?

Originally Posted by Ender

Not really. Even if I don't like a game (Lets take Brawl for example) I can still admit that its a very high quality game.

Like I said, "Quality" is in the eye of the beholder. What do you view as quality? For me, fun factor, artwork, and music are examples of I can find as quality in a game. I don't recognize graphics very much, since I don't need them to be state-of-the-art in order to enjoy myself, for instance.

Originally Posted by Blizzaga

I'm sorry. Why are you spamming again?



Like I said, "Quality" is in the eye of the beholder. What do you view as quality? For me, fun factor, artwork, and music are examples of I can find as quality in a game. I don't recognize graphics very much, since I don't need them to be state-of-the-art in order to enjoy myself, for instance.

Graphics are a huge part of games. If you weren't a huge Nintendo fanboy (And you are, by the way) you'd agree with me. You probably weren't saying that back when OoT came out and it had the best graphics out there.

I'm responding to your posts with my opinion, and judging from your replies, I gather you don't have a relevant point to make?

Originally Posted by Ender

The Legend Of Zelda, Super Mario Bros, Duck Hunt.... All quality NES games. I wasn't even alive when the NES was around, so I don't have the most experience with the system, but "fun" and "quality" are basically the same thing.

It came out the year before I was born, but my parents had one for as long as I remember.