Medal of Honor: Vanguard

husky that is, right? and then it's 2 or more campaigns. Then I would disagree with you saying that's enough. You have to play more of the it. Have you even started to take out tanks and such? That's one of the trickier thing in the game, if you ask me. And later on, some missions are plain horror. if you do the slightest thing wrong, you're dead. I remember dying before getting my parachute off after landing. Talk about rediculous.

Originally Posted by AzKicker

husky that is, right? and then it's 2 or more campaigns. Then I would disagree with you saying that's enough. You have to play more of the it. Have you even started to take out tanks and such? That's one of the trickier thing in the game, if you ask me. And later on, some missions are plain horror. if you do the slightest thing wrong, you're dead. I remember dying before getting my parachute off after landing. Talk about rediculous.

Oh, a game is ridiculous just because you think it's really hard? I don't see people calling AoL ridiculous.

You're missing the point, Kynnella. He simply means that he doesn't think you should judge the game based on the first campaign only.

Well, I think I can. I'll critique it more when I get further.

The Medal of Honor series has and always will be mediocre in the world of first-person shooters.

But see, you've already given the game its final score, saying it's a great game and so on and so on. If you haven't even played half of it, you're not really in a position to give a final score. You can say you have a good impression of the game so far, but you can't go straight out and claim the entire game is great. You haven't seen all of it, so don't judge it based on the small part you have seen.

Originally Posted by Kynnella

Oh, a game is ridiculous just because you think it's really hard? I don't see people calling AoL ridiculous.

No, it's rediculous because I die before I start playing

Not that I say that the game itself is rediculous... just that very thing.

Originally Posted by Captain "William Kilgore" Cornflake

The Medal of Honor series has and always will be mediocre in the world of first-person shooters.

Quoted for truth.

And Kynella if you haven't even completed the game. Then your position on the game isn't even valid.

Originally Posted by Captain "William Kilgore" Cornflake

The Medal of Honor series has and always will be mediocre in the world of first-person shooters.

Opinions.

Zeldafan1: I've still played the game and that counts. I like the game. I've always been a big fan of Medal of Honor.

Originally Posted by Kynella

Opinions.

Can you stop using that as a defense?

Zeldafan1: I've still played the game and that counts. I like the game. I've always been a big fan of Medal of Honor.

You still should play the WHOLE game to figure out how the entire game holds through.

You've already given it a final score, and you haven't finished. That's being bias. You're preemptively judging something you haven't even completed. And it's possible you will not like the game all the way through, so it's better that you finish the game before even placing a final score.

I never said that score was final. I might change it.

And I said opinions because that's what Capn' made. An opinion.

Kynnella, you're not going to win in an argument against someone as smart as Zeldafan, I've tried. He always wins. Just stop now, I just read through 5 pages of you making a fool out of yourself.

On Topic: I've always wanted to play Medal of Honor. But from the reviews I've read recently and after reading this thread I don't think I want to.

I'll stick with Halo for now.

Originally posted by Twilight
Kynnella, you're not going to win in an argument against someone as smart as Zeldafan, I've tried. He always wins.

This is the funniest thing I've ever read. And it has nothing to do with Zeldafan, anyone's name there makes it hysterical.

Originally Posted by Kynnella

Opinions.

Originally Posted by Kynnella

And I said opinions because that's what Capn' made. An opinion.

Well no ****ing ****.

Do you think everybody else here is retarded enough that they can't tell what an opinion is, so you have to point it out for them?

Of course it is a ****ing opinion. Quit insulting everybody's intelligence (and especially mine) by pointing out it is an opinion. Is it supposed to be some kind of witty retort? Do you think that I don't know what an opinion is? Am I supposed to clarify whatever I say as "well, this is just my opinion" because if I don't, that automatically means I'm trying to pass it off as a fact?

Seriously, what the hell. You wonder why people don't like you.

One reason I stopped posting amongst the masses here is because no one can seem to take an opinion for what it is. What ends up happening is everyone goes around trying to demean the opinions of others, rather than accepting them or better yet... discussing them like civilized people.

"Opinions" is a short and bs way of saying "Your opinion means nothing to me, and shouldn't be looked upon again." And that type of comment is what separates the a-holes from the rest of us.

Mess wins the internet.

Originally Posted by Mirren

This is the funniest thing I've ever read. And it has nothing to do with Zeldafan, anyone's name there makes it hysterical.

You had to ruin it, didn't you. Lol

Anyway, Kynella the only refute you had to anyone was "opinions". Sometimes that type of argument can backfire on you, trust me I've tried.

Originally Posted by AzKicker

Going to hit the dirt soon just like the CG did... Errr, no. The company you're talking about would be Sony, if any.

What I'm talking about is the lack of titles the Wii has for itself. The GC started off well with tons of great titles: Super Smash bros, Mario Sunshine, but then towards the end it seemed to die off. Nintendo promised the new Zelda game (after WW) would push the GC graphics and would make the GC worth buying and yet I was forced to wait two years for it? Then they release it on the Wii and GC? Nintendo pushes things around and half of the games in Japan don't come over here where the PS3 has a huge title backing. The PS2 lasted waaaayyy longer then the GC and N64 put together. Thats why I know the Wii is going to...well fade away just like the GC did.

Originally Posted by Captain "William Kilgore" Cornflake

The Medal of Honor series has and always will be mediocre in the world of first-person shooters.

Agreed. It was good the frist two times but now those games are now too common.

Nice I mean the only moh iv played is the first one...But I hear for the wii its pretty good...

Originally Posted by Zeldafan1

You had to ruin it, didn't you. Lol

Anyway, Kynella the only refute you had to anyone was "opinions". Sometimes that type of argument can backfire on you, trust me I've tried.

Haha, Zeldafan1 is very smart for his age. He's a great debater.

A week ago, I argued with him. I knew I wasn't going to win (because I didn't believe what I was fighting for in the first place), so I suggested calling it a draw, and we stopped.

Zeldafan1 is one of the few people on this board that could put up a good fight, so think twice before starting something with him.