Zoonami leaks info on Rev

I doubt its true but it's an interesting read.
http://www.nintendorevolutionforums....isplay.php?f=7
It starts at New Info/Revolution game: Guts N' Glory and ends with New Info/ e-mail #11

I am excited about its combat engine as much as this one is the new Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, which will have a revamped combat engine that has me very excited to play with, but this has not been revealed to the public yet. We want to keep most of the combat engine details under wraps for now as we are excited to see how this great new technology will effect the way action games are made for years to come.

Hell yeah! *explodes*

I'll be spending a lot of time thinking on this.

While his combat info seems true, his talk of

the possible romance between Zelda and Ganondorf, the past friendship between link and ganondorf, Link actually holding the feirce diety's maks, link shooting 3 arrows at once.. aye, it's all too... horrible, it's like he's speaking from a 13 year old's PoV.

Strange.

The link isn't working for me at all.

Anyone want to summarize the contents for me? With spoiler tags, of course?

You can check out the TP hype thread, I posted all the TP info there.

Even if it not true the idea are brilliant. I can see games being made for the Revolution using these ideas.

Nintendo is not stupid enough to leak sources to game sites or any other sites. It has always been Nintendo's policy to keep their projects secret until the last minute. Until Nintendo reveals these ideas themselves officially, I judge these information as absolute lies created to get more visitors to visit their site.

And it's a forum site anyway with 45 members. Not trust-worthy at all.

Most of it is complete fluff: No real content, just vacuous statements that apply to any game. Take the statement Kokiri_Boy64 quoted. The entire quote breaks down to "It's new. It's secret." Swap out "Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess" and it could be referring to any game. Ever.

This is true for each of the emails: Everything is extremely vague, a re-iteration of what's already known (rumors or media), and obscenely pleonastic, with a bit of speculation on the side. Moreover some of it is complete gibberish (the author seems to confuse HD and HD-DVD, and I wouldn't expect any developer to have a HD-DVD in-office, let alone proto-or-stamp). It honestly looks as if someone just story-hopped from IGN?