Stupid Bush(!)

'President Bush has officially declared Oct. 12-18 as "Marriage Protection Week". One of the coalition's goals is to build support for a Constitutional amendment to permanently deny civil marriage to same-sex couples.'



Eaarrrgghh. That irritates me beyond words. What is your view?

i back bush usually, im not sure i can have a view until i discuss it with my peers.

i quite agree that there should be no same-sex marriages. if humans were meant to do that, then two dudes or two chicks would be able to reproduce. one man, one woman. thats it.

so, i back bush on this

I think that its ok if homosexuals want to be married, though I dont agree with their actions..........as a wise man once said,

"It was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve" 0_0

I'd strangle him myself if he was in reach.

Ok, there are a billion reasons why I don't back bush, and this just adds to the long list.

By chance did you read this on a news website? If so, could you PM it to me? I'm interrested in reading more crap that bush is pulling.

Rather than getting in a long debate about politics, and marriage and gay rights, I just say that I don't think this is something that should be put in the United States Constitution. It's something to be decided by individuals. What people do with their lives is their own buisness (sp???? -_-) .

So basically, next election, you bet that I will be voting out Bush. (heh, and people critisized me for NOT voting for him... I might have had the right idea all along.)

Please, don't flame me, I'm just a person with OPINIONS like every one else. I have nothing against anyone who believes differently than I. That is what is great about being human. We all have different wills, and different ideas, different minds. Please keep that in mind before you might go off on me for some reason.

^_^;;

I really think homosexuals should be able to marry if they want to. I mean, they are human, so it's not that bad. And when you get married you don't have to have kids neccissarily, so it shouldn't be that big of a deal, IMO.

well i guess i did understand what was being said.. i back him on this

I do agree with this action. I think that same sex(insert anything here that should be done with two people of the opposite sex here) is wrong. Like Baka-Neko said, if it were right the two guys or chicks should be able to produce a child. Nothing a against the people at all, just that kind of stuff makes me sick.

EDIT: I agree with Bush.
I disagree with the actions of homosexuals not the people practicing those things. Sorry if I didn't voice my opinion clearly enough.

-cheers for Sadida- ^_^;

Originally posted by Insanity
I do agree with this action. I think that same sex(insert anything here that should be done with two people of the opposite sex here) is wrong. Like Baka-Neko said, if it were right the two guys or chicks should be able to produce a child. Nothing a against the people at all, just that kind of stuff makes me sick.

I agree with Bush, in simple terms.

You say you have nothing against the people at all, then turn right around and say it shouldn't be allowed.

You can't be both sides, so pick one.

As much as I dislike Bush, I'm afraid I'm also going to need to request a source for this one. For all my lack of faith in the man, supporting such a silly zealot mentality would be a new low.

i quite agree that there should be no same-sex marriages. if humans were meant to do that, then two dudes or two chicks would be able to reproduce. one man, one woman. thats it.

So you would deny the right to marriage to the impotent?

I think it's unfar, I say if they are not hurting anyone then it's okay let them do what they want to do, it them not you, leve it alone.

well.. it isnt physically heaslthy... like um.. i dont need to go into details here... but loved ones... make love... well... making love was designed for A+B to make C, not A+A to make.... nothing or B+B for nothing... not compatable.... physically

How exactly is it unhealthy? Because I honestly don't think it is unhealthy, but I could always be wrong.

And if you're to squeamish to explain ourself, why should I value your opinion?

well.. it isnt physically heaslthy... like um.. i dont need to go into details here... but loved ones... make love... well... making love was designed for A+B to make C, not A+A to make.... nothing or B+B for nothing... not compatable.... physically

Man has no wings and yet he flies. Has no fins and yet he swims. A wing is a wing, a limb is a limb, and orifice is an orifice, and an impotent should by the same measure be denied the right to heterosexual marriage.

The mandate of opposite sex traces to the Rule of Law's theological basis, which specifically stipulates an associated procreation mandate.

If you aren't exercising a clear, distinct, and justifiable basis for denial of marriage, you are presenting an unfair and inequitable bias, denying a specific and arbitrary group of one of the fundamental rights held dear in our society; That of recognized companionship.

*apology in advance if this relates too much to religion*

IMO, Bush is only doing this to get on the Popes good side. Since homosexuality is a "sin", if Bush outlaws it, he'll probably gain some more support from John-Paul.

Now, I must say I dont back Bush. Those people are being ridiculed day after day and its unfair to them, now, Bush makes it unlawful to be intimate with a member of the same sex? Its unjust for sure, you cant deny someone that right.......oh wait I guess you can, huh? Still doesnt make it right. I dont have anything against gays, so this is pretty lame IMO.

Originally posted by lord-of-shadow
How exactly is it unhealthy? Because I honestly don't think it is unhealthy, but I could always be wrong.

And if you're to squeamish to explain ourself, why should I value your opinion?

alright i'll be blunt.. from what im told.. gay guys get it up the butt man... that is unhealthy.... doctor proven -__- and females... they (from what ive been told and actually seen) kinda put there areas ike... in a position...... anyways its un healthy doing that too, and stap on dealios.... made too big at times because they think that that is what makes it better... but its not, therefor they might hit the back, unhealthy... physically... nothing healthy comes from this as far as i know....

I personally dont see what problem everyone has with this. I have absolotutly nothing against gays, and if they want to get married and have sex or whatever, that is fine with me.

Mess: Smoking is also proven to be dangerous, and thats not illegalized. And thats even more dangerous.
It is a good point that he is probably doing it to get on the pope's good side, but still. The whole basis of this arguement against homosexuality is purely theological. Whatever the government dictates about this topic and such should all be disregarded. I'm not gay, but I know many people who are, and every single one of them is a great person. Restricting their right to do what they want is almost like arbitrary repression. My personal opinion, Bush needs to shut the hell up and go do something more his speed, like solitare.