Calendar Awards Members List FAQ
Notices

Reply
$ LinkBack Thread Tools
 
  #1   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 01:57 PM
Hylian Knight
Join Date: Mar 2004
View Posts: 940
'Adams' Proved existance

Quote:
Well it is said they proved there was one man who passed down a genetic mutation that all men have! It doesnt mean his name was Adam, but it does mean there was one man that fathered us all. AND it ties Evolution with Religion. OK

The genetic mutation caused Adam to be able to think like we do. The first person that was civilized.

They traced the mutation to the Rift Valley in South America. Which matches the scenes in the Bible

That shows that Adams homeland was there, and was therefor a person of color!

The modeled Adams head and this is what he was said to look like.

Source: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ncerwells.html
__________________

.: THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING :.

Reply With Quote
  #2   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 02:00 PM
?!מה פיתום

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa ON
View Posts: 2,999
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

Avoid explicitly religious discussion in this topic, please. I won't hesitate to hand out strikes.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #3   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 02:10 PM
Hylian Knight
Join Date: Mar 2004
View Posts: 940
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

This thread is science, not religion.
__________________

.: THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING :.

Reply With Quote
  #4   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 02:15 PM
?!מה פיתום

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa ON
View Posts: 2,999
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Nemesis
This thread is science, not religion.
And I'm requesting that it stay that way -- many would attempt to derail it into a creationism vs evolution debate.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #5   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 02:19 PM
Hylian Knight
Join Date: Mar 2004
View Posts: 940
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

8bit- Its been speculated that humans derived from a form of mutation, but now its been traced back to modern day humans, in other words its just been proved. Supposedly 'Eve' was traced back to Asia somewhere, and due to tectonic shifting etc it would make sense if 'Adam' and 'Eve' originated from the same place.

EDIT: Trico, I'll try my best to keep everything away from religion.

Also can I just say now, to avoid complications, 'Adam' and 'Eve' are just terms to define the first modern day human male and female, not the biblical characters.
__________________

.: THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING :.

Reply With Quote
  #6   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 02:19 PM
Nox Nox is a Nox is offline
The definition of "greatness"
Send a message via AIM to Nox
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St. Louis
View Posts: 6,862
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

Quote:
They traced the mutation to the Rift Valley in South America.
South America? That means the Amazon is in Africa!

But yeah, this is an intresting find here. I dont really have much more to say, but it'd be cool if they also find 'Eve'
__________________

Awesome avatar art by Liah. <3
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #7   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 02:20 PM
Shut your f***ing mouth when you're talking to me
Send a message via AIM to Kaze-one
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: A Brothel
View Posts: 923
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

Very interesting.
I remember some dumb N.Geo special a few years ago called the Real Eve.
I believe that you can believe in both creationism and evolution, that they don't each deny the other.
Although i think it should be pretty obvious on a scientific basis that the first man was no white man.
__________________

Wimbledon 2007
Reply With Quote
  #8   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 02:23 PM
Apple Pie and Police State
Send a message via MSN to 8bit
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Murphysboro, Illinois
View Posts: 1,895
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nox
South America? That means the Amazon is in Africa!

But yeah, this is an intresting find here. I dont really have much more to say, but it'd be coll if they also find 'Eve'
Well Im sure that if there is an "Adam" there has to be an "Eve" because..... well...... you know. I do believe this is old news though. herd about it a few years ago, I did.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #9   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 02:36 PM
Hylian Knight
Join Date: Mar 2004
View Posts: 940
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8bit
Well Im sure that if there is an "Adam" there has to be an "Eve" because..... well...... you know. I do believe this is old news though. herd about it a few years ago, I did.
As I said before, you're right this has been speculated before, but now they have found more evidence etc. to actually prove it
__________________

.: THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING :.

Reply With Quote
  #10   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 02:41 PM
Officially Retired from ZU :0)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Elsewhere.
View Posts: 7,969
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

Quote:
They traced the mutation to the Rift Valley in South America. Which matches the scenes in the Bible
I think not. The Bible is very explicit about the location of the Garden of Eden. It triangulates it for us, actually.

Sorry, Trick, I couldn't let that one slide.

Anyway, although I don't know how far this thread can go (I expect a short lifespan simply due to lack of inert momentum), I will say that there are those scientists who believe all of mankind originated from one single female... Somewhat related, perhaps, to this topic of conversation.
__________________

I've officially retired from ZU, guys. I left loving this place, and I enjoyed the company of so many of you. Thank you for sharing with me, and I hope that in some way I've touched your lives (hopefully for the better and to God's glory). In Jesus' name, I end this chapter and open another! -BBD+
(and just for old times' sake...) :0( :0o :0S :0P'' ;0) ()_(); *_* >_> <_< o_O :0| :0\ :0O :09 and finally :0)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #11   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 02:50 PM
Shut your f***ing mouth when you're talking to me
Send a message via AIM to Kaze-one
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: A Brothel
View Posts: 923
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bro Davidia
I think not. The Bible is very explicit about the location of the Garden of Eden. It triangulates it for us, actually.

Sorry, Trick, I couldn't let that one slide.

Anyway, although I don't know how far this thread can go (I expect a short lifespan simply due to lack of inert momentum), I will say that there are those scientists who believe all of mankind originated from one single female... Somewhat related, perhaps, to this topic of conversation.
He's quite right.
Here, i've got proof. Not to be too trying to be overtly religious but....

Genesis 2:10-14
A river flows out of Eden to water the garden and from there it divides and becomes four branches. The name of the first is PIshon; it is the one that flows around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold; and the gold of that land is good; bdellium and onyx stone are there. The name of the second river is Gihon; it is the one that flows around the whole land of Cush. The name of the third river is Tigris, which flows east of Assyria. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.

So if you're going by Jewish tradition, Eden was situated in the southern part of the middle east, near Sumeria, the first advanced civilization on earth (pretty much)
__________________

Wimbledon 2007
Reply With Quote
  #12   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 03:03 PM
Hylian Knight
Join Date: Mar 2004
View Posts: 940
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

The quote in post #1 was taken from a friend, please excuse any mistakes in it
__________________

.: THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING :.

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #13   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 03:10 PM
Officially Retired from ZU :0)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Elsewhere.
View Posts: 7,969
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Nemesis
The quote in post #1 was taken from a friend, please excuse any mistakes in it
Yeah, I noticed it wasn't from you ;0) Excused, hehe.

I just wish I had something more to add, because we should make this as scientifically based as possible. All I can say is that mutations of that magnitude are impossible (speaking from what we observe in these days) without elaborate intermediate stages. I find it hard to believe that this "Adam" fellow suddenly found himself able to think on our level, yet his progenitors were much further back. Take a look at a two-year-old's ability to think and a twelve-year-old's. Both are highly advanced individuals (by animal standards--notwithstanding that some creatures are said to be able to think up to the level of a six-year-old at their prime of life). However, there must stages in between which are almost indistinguishable when set side by side due to the sheer number of them within a short space of time. Psychologists can only hope to group them together in some type of spectrum.
__________________

I've officially retired from ZU, guys. I left loving this place, and I enjoyed the company of so many of you. Thank you for sharing with me, and I hope that in some way I've touched your lives (hopefully for the better and to God's glory). In Jesus' name, I end this chapter and open another! -BBD+
(and just for old times' sake...) :0( :0o :0S :0P'' ;0) ()_(); *_* >_> <_< o_O :0| :0\ :0O :09 and finally :0)
Reply With Quote
  #14   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 03:17 PM
Hylian Knight
Join Date: Mar 2004
View Posts: 940
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Bro Davidia
Yeah, I noticed it wasn't from you ;0) Excused, hehe.

I just wish I had something more to add, because we should make this as scientifically based as possible. All I can say is that mutations of that magnitude are impossible (speaking from what we observe in these days) without elaborate intermediate stages. I find it hard to believe that this "Adam" fellow suddenly found himself able to think on our level, yet his progenitors were much further back. Take a look at a two-year-old's ability to think and a twelve-year-old's. Both are highly advanced individuals (by animal standards--notwithstanding that some creatures are said to be able to think up to the level of a six-year-old at their prime of life). However, there must stages in between which are almost indistinguishable when set side by side due to the sheer number of them within a short space of time. Psychologists can only hope to group them together in some type of spectrum.
To my understanding the mutation itself was a gradual event, where the jaw became smaller, and the cranium (a portion of the skull) became larger, which allowed for a larger brain and therefore more development. Like I said, I think it happened over time but 'Adam' was the first humanoid that would scientifically be defined as a modern day human.
__________________

.: THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING :.

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #15   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 04:46 PM
Banned Forever and Ever
Send a message via AIM to Nathan Send a message via MSN to Nathan Send a message via Yahoo to Nathan

Join Date: Mar 2003
View Posts: 660
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

this is amazing. Proof of us comming from one man. All relgion aside, this is amazing. Evolution "may" have ooccured, but haveing a source finally is amazing.
Reply With Quote
  #16   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 04:56 PM
Eating muffins via osmosis

Join Date: Jun 2005
View Posts: 13,341
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

I feel so connected to the world now - the proof that we all share the same blood - bless my hippy soul! (wipes tears of happiness from eyes!)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #17   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 06:03 PM
Sage of Wisdom
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
View Posts: 1,262
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Nemesis
8bit- Its been speculated that humans derived from a form of mutation, but now its been traced back to modern day humans, in other words its just been proved. Supposedly 'Eve' was traced back to Asia somewhere, and due to tectonic shifting etc it would make sense if 'Adam' and 'Eve' originated from the same place.

EDIT: Trico, I'll try my best to keep everything away from religion.

Also can I just say now, to avoid complications, 'Adam' and 'Eve' are just terms to define the first modern day human male and female, not the biblical characters.
I'm not sure I understand. If "Adam" was the pioneer of humanity, then was "Eve" a descendent, but the first female descendent? Or did they develop the same mutation in the same generation?
Reply With Quote
  #18   [ ]
Old 07-13-2005, 09:07 PM
Max Nichols
Send a message via AIM to lord-of-shadow
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Hampshire
View Posts: 9,722
Re: 'Adams' Proved existance