Quote:
|
Originally Posted by slither Why would you believe, well, anything a money sucking pastor tells you? Are you just listening to your parents beliefs? |
That's a bit of a loaded question there. You've already decided that anyone religious is just believing anything they're told. It's like asking someone why they got a new car by asking them "why would you want to speed?" You've already decided for them that they got the car because they want to speed, rather than giving them a neutral question to respond to.
While people do often end up sticking with their parents' beliefs, that's just as true for atheists as it is for religious people. Your prepositions don't actually address the question of why it would be believed in the first place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thane If you are asking for proof, you don't understand the meaning of faith. |
Yes, the question of God existing is one that in the end can't be scientifically proved, because the question doesn't really make sense in the context. Scientifically proving things involves there being an actual physical thing to measure, and phrasing it that way makes it seem like the existence of God is something that can be proved with a telescope and some patience. It's just an unsuitable question for the topic. Statements like "the existence of God can't be scientifically proven" mean as little to debate as "the existence of love can't be scientifically proven!" It doesn't mean that love doesn't exist, just that you're asking the wrong question because science experiments aren't how philosophy works in the first place. You can't use testable experiments (the foundation of science) to prove or disprove the concept of God any more than you can measure Justice in kilograms.
The fact that "the existence of God can't be scientifically proven" doesn't at all mean that people don't have any kind of background to their claims. The reasons behind belief in God are wide and varied, and range from historical research on miraculous events to personal experiences to philosophical arguments. For example, Bishop N.T. Wright's beliefs have a strong foundation in his experience as a historical scholar and findings on the historical figure of Jesus, while say C.S. Lewis had little experience with that but has several strong philosophical arguments around there being something more to life.
When you ask why, nobody can just give you a complete handy summary of why people believe, because the fact is that it's so complicated that thought applied to religion is an entire branch of philosophy, known as theology. If you're interested in the subject, there's enough to read to last you a lifetime.