Quote:
Originally Posted by Erasmus even the most adamant skeptic and/or solipsist has trouble logically backing that statement up.
May I throw a quote from Descarte's 10'th meditation at you?
or should I listen more to your thought justifications first?
|
Well "The Universe" is defines as Follows: the totality of known or supposed objects and phenomena throughout space; the cosmos; macrocosm.
Now we must examine this definition (as is the standard) to determine wither or not it is believable. I shall look at the two most important words. That being "known" and "Totality". By examining these two we can determine if it is believable that the universe does in fact exist.
Firstly I shall deconstruct what we perceive as the world "known" commonly described as "to perceive or understand as fact or truth; to apprehend clearly and with certainty". When it says we must perceive it it means we must use one of our sense to determine weather or not the object in question exists. However if all we have to rely on is our sense one must bring up the point that our sense are far from infallible; other then the obvious point that people are deaf, blind, and without touch, we must also recognize that even those who can experience such things but their experiences differentiate between each other. Issues such as a dog being able to hear better then human, colour blindness and congenital insensitivity to pain. If we can be wrong, or inaccurate about our sense-the very thing we use to determine facts- how can be sure we know anything at all. Though it may be a slippery slope I propose that nothing is known, and in fact is only presumed until proven incorrect. The Uncertainty principle taken to philosophical ends, as it where. So if nothing can be known, then where does that leave the universe that we "Know" exists.
For now we must move on from known, to "Totality" which not give me even half as much trouble as the former. Totality is defined as "the state of being total; entirety." Eternity. Eternity. what is eternity, the ever expanding, the endless. Who among us can in vision eternity, who can describe it? Eternity by very thought is either impossible, and thus cannot exist, or is so far fetched we humans will ever understand it. or know it. Without knowing what Totality means, how can we be sure it means anything. All encompassing only goes so far if one can not encompass it.
So if Known by definition is impossible to know, and totality cannot encompass eternity then the universe -Which must be by definition the known totality- either does not and cannot exist, or is such a crazy idea one must be mad to imagine it existing. Therefore one can assume the universe probably does not exist.
Taadaa? Hopefully that didn't convince anyone as it was purposely mumbo jumbo. Was kinda fun to write though =D