Wikipedia info on Twilight Princess

The link to this info I found on the net on Wikipedia is this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twilight_Princess it pretty much tells alot on info that Nintendo gave tell me how this affects your opinion on the game and if you are still interested and also give me your opinions on this info if it helps, or make the game more interesting (also this info is all true it was given to them by Nintendo) and give me opinions on the different features that they mention about on the game TP.

Ah, so toaru means unnamed...interesting...

The wikipedia people are kind of annoying, so I'm wondering who they let post this article.

If it is true, then it will be interesting to see how they bring him in as an adult, a teen, and a kid. I would say flashbacks, but it is a different Link, so that isn't possible. I really hope that this is true.

I don't believe the part about Zelda being Midna.... they don't even act alike.

There's another Fado in this game? what's up with these names.....could it be that it's the same Fado as the spirit in WW? Or has kokiri's aleady dissapeared?

I'm glad they made TP seem more 'realistic' in a way where you can be thrown off the horses saddle and animals look more like animals.

I don't believe the part about Zelda being Midna.... they don't even act alike.

How do you know what midna acts like or zelda for al we know they could act very much the same!

Well I can at least disprove Zelda=Midna

Check the interview in my sig... Link is the only one to transform in the twilight.

Originally Posted by Rath

I don't believe the part about Zelda being Midna.... they don't even act alike.

Well, what about in OoT? Zelda is Shiek, but Shiek is a guy (or is reffered as one in the game), and Zelda is obviously a girl. No one knew about Shiek until later in the game, so there might be a possibility that Midna is Zelda.

But yeah, I doubt it too.

Wow, that is a lot of information, thanks. That really helped.

Originally Posted by Jayolorin

The wikipedia people are kind of annoying, so I'm wondering who they let post this article.

You know, anyone can add/edit wikipedia content so articles on that site are sometimes a mishmash of facts, opinions and rumors contributed by several people

I would not be surprised if some of that info is pure speculation.

Originally Posted by Godsmack'd

Well, what about in OoT? Zelda is Shiek, but Shiek is a guy (or is reffered as one in the game), and Zelda is obviously a girl. No one knew about Shiek until later in the game, so there might be a possibility that Midna is Zelda.

But yeah, I doubt it too.

How on earth can Midna be Zelda? Midna is the little creature who rides on Links back in the Twilight Realm. In normal Hyrule Midna is a little creature yet again who gives advice to Link live Navi would. And somehow comes out of no where and speaks...

You guys they aren't saying Zelda is Midna its just a theory some parts are theories and others are parts confirmed by Nintendo heh but like 50% is theories or somewhere near that but some is confirmed others aren't so no need to start getting testy.

i find it interesting that ganon will make an appearence and i can't wait to find out what his role will be and i first thought that tauro village was a classic zelda style name but it turns out it just means unnamed in japanese, pretty weak, but it did say the name of the village could change so we'll have to owait and see, huh.

Wikipedia is full of crackheads and is only to be used as a reference, not actual information.

i dont see why midna couldnt be zelda. i mean oot and ww both had zelda disguised as something else. nintendo does repeat ideas alot in their games.

I've read some articles a while back that suspected that Twilight Princess is a prequel to Wind Waker. Since Twilight Princess is darker than the other Zelda's, it could be about the fall of Hyrule before it was buried under the sea. This isn't my opinion, but it does make a bit of sense. However, we won't know until we actually get to play it.

Check my sig... Link is the ONLY person to transform in the Twilight.

Thus, Zelda=Zelda and Midna=Midna.

I have never gotten why people are so fascinated in identifying Midna as one thing or another. I said it before, when I first started, and I'll say it again.

Midna is most likely, and very possibly, a new character. What is wrong with that?

I have totally accepted Midna as a new character since I saw the trailer of her freeing Wolf-Link from the cell he was in. There's nothing wrong with adding new characters to a popular franchise. The Mario universe does it all the time: Wario, Waluigi, Toadsworth, Toadette, Bowser Jr, etc. So what's wrong with having an all-new character in the Zelda series?

Thank you for agreeing with me

For the record, though, I was responding to Shaun.

I don't believe the flooding will be a main part of Twilight Princess, but there may be a few easter eggs that tell of the flood in the future somehow, making sure to tie in with WW