Who is still opposed to Voice Acting?

Originally Posted by Double A

Funny, I tend to remember things better when they're read. I find things far easier to miss in VA, because it appears, and disappears. Text can stay on the screen as long as you want, or as short as you want. It appears fast, it disappears whenever you want it to.

So they shouldn't have voice acting because you're a little slow?

Originally Posted by Enuf3

So they shouldn't have voice acting because you're a little slow?

No, they shouldn't have VA coz I'm a little fast.

Well, I'm a visual person. And I'd rather be able to watch a scene rather than read it.

Originally Posted by Zeldablue777

Well, I'm a visual person. And I'd rather be able to watch a scene rather than read it.

I'd rather be able to watch a scene than hear it.

...That doesn't make sense. You need eyes to read so you can't "watch" while doing something else with the same facial organ. xD However hearing does not require the attention of the eyes. Kind of reminds me of a certain cartoon quote.

"Open your eyes!" "NO!" "You'll have to breath sometime..." "Ah! ...wait, what does breathing have to go with my eyes?"

Originally Posted by Zeldablue777

...That doesn't make sense. You need eyes to read so you can't "watch" while doing something else with the same facial organ. xD However hearing does not require the attention of the eyes. Kind of reminds me of a certain cartoon quote.

Well I can obviously do things you can't do, and vice versa.

...Can't be totally immersed in visuals while reading simultaneously. If you have a hard time watching TV while hearing it at the same time then something is wrong. However trying to watch TV while reading a book is quite a task, you usually end up missing out on some the action. Some of Zelda's cutscenes do that to you.

I read fast, so I don't miss out on anything.

I like the idea of voice acting
i agree with zeldablue if they havd it like farcry 2 i would be happy cause that has subtitles and u can hear wat they say.