|
||||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
Link already has a pet, noobs.
At least it counts as one in my book. Besides, if Links starts having pets, soon this will turn into you know what, and nobody wants that. Nobody. NO. BODY.
__________________
-thank you veritas for the lovely sig& avvy- |

|
|||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
Either that or a mini Volvagia or the air temple boss in Twilight Princess!!! That would be awesome, you have like a knat sized Volvagia (or TP air temple boss) and then all of a sudden a gigantic torrent of flame erupts from its mouth and engulfs your enemy!!! lol
__________________
|

| Advertisement |
|
|||

|
||||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
Quote:
and yeah, another moosh would be fan-freaking-tastic. i loved him and ricki. not so much demetri.
__________________
eulsroiys i elki tahe githye vife recenpt fo uoy peelop no reeh. |

| Advertisement |
|
|||

|
||||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
but think for a second ok... thus would make a zelda a turn based rpg... or at least for combat.
__________________
Quote:
|

| Advertisement |
|
||||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
.....How? Do you know exactly what a turn based RPG is compared to Zelda? In no way would that happen.
__________________
{Thanks to sage_of_fire for the sig} ![]() ![]() "In the passing of thens of thousands of years, only a few decades are given to you...What meaning do these years hold? Among the billions of lives that have become, what is the meaning of yours? There is no truth in the world, yet this world is full of truths. To find the meaning of your life, you must first find the meaningless of your life." |

| Advertisement |
|
||||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
Quote:
How in the hell would it become a turn based RPG by adding a dog? Seriously, explain this to me. I want to understand the thought process behind this statement.
__________________
“ ”
|

|
||||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
That might be a lot like what they did in the Oracle games. Not too bad an idea. The dog thing has not been done in TP. We're talking about having a dog companion. Not turning into a dog.
I haven't read the whole thread. It would probably be easier to just make the sidekick useful in battle. Like what they did with Midna. except improve on that some more by letting her or him do more stuff.
__________________
![]() ......................................../`````````````````````````````````````````\ .........TWW-PH-ST-(LoZ-AoL)-(OoX)-TMC-FS-FSA-ALttP-LA-(OoX)-(LoZ-AoL) OoT<.............................................. \____________________/ .........MM-TP |

| Advertisement |
|
|||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
Quote:
Link's courage is proven by the steel of blade rather then the command of an attack (sic' em boy!) I agree to an extent and as I stated earlier, I dont agree...
__________________
![]() GO TEAM SEA SLUG!!! OSAKA APPROVES OF THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE! ![]() Basil, Deity of Yuzhno-Karafuto Hayao Nakaki, Lord of Tesla |

|
||||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
I realise the difference, but the point is the games have already featured a dog in battle. Normaqly I don't mind the games sharing features and similarities, but that coupled with the other reasons I listed off lead me to believe there are better choices then a dog.
__________________
{Thanks to sage_of_fire for the sig} ![]() ![]() "In the passing of thens of thousands of years, only a few decades are given to you...What meaning do these years hold? Among the billions of lives that have become, what is the meaning of yours? There is no truth in the world, yet this world is full of truths. To find the meaning of your life, you must first find the meaningless of your life." |

| Advertisement |
|
|||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
Quote:
![]()
__________________
SURE IS HARDCORE AROUND HERE |

|
||||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
Have you ever heard of Strap-on? There's your answer. That also explains why Epona gets tired so fast....
|

| Advertisement |
|
|||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
I don't think a pets a bad idea. Take for example:
Shadow of the Colossus: Hopefully everyone knows what this game is about because it is amazing. But throughout the game you're trying to kill giant creatures and you have your trusted horse with you along the way. I know the whole horse thing sounds like Epona but Agro, the horse in SOTC, is the only living creature beside the Colossi in the game so you develop this great emotional bond for this pet of the main character. SPOILER WARNING for SOTC: Well, when your on your way to kill the last Colossi your horse seems to be killed by falling of a cliff. I think if there was a pet aspect in Zelda it should be something like this. A creature you build a strong emotional bond with but it is killed somehow in the end I think it would add much more emotional depth into the world of Zelda and also possibly kill off a main character of the game, which has been asked of many fans of the series. |

|
||||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
sugar, we are talking about how a pet would affect a zelda game, not how "oh my golly god and jesus that dog from fable was so effin awesome and how cool would it be if like a dog like that could totally be in a zelda game!" and another thing, even if a dog like that game into the game(which a dog never will, minus the wolf from TP), then it certainly wouldnt be like a dog from any other game.
__________________
eulsroiys i elki tahe githye vife recenpt fo uoy peelop no reeh. |

| Advertisement |
|
||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
IMO Link dont need a pet, I can imagine it. Epona is fine, maybe a pet they could use is a owl or hawk making reference to the OoT owl... but with a role similar to Epona, i mean, not to use it to fly over hyrule, use it to reach some places like in WW that Link can control birds with a pear (or something) to reach some diamonds
|

|
||||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
Or maybe they should try to make Epona a bigger part of a story. They kind of botched it when they made a game where Link can talk to animals, but Epona only says two things.
Not quite sure how to work it, though. The horseback battles were a step in the right direction. Now we just need something else.
__________________
![]() ......................................../`````````````````````````````````````````\ .........TWW-PH-ST-(LoZ-AoL)-(OoX)-TMC-FS-FSA-ALttP-LA-(OoX)-(LoZ-AoL) OoT<.............................................. \____________________/ .........MM-TP |

| Advertisement |
|
|||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
__________________
Quote:
|

|
||||
|
Re: Link needs a pet, not a sidekick.
Erm, not what I meant. The horse is an animal that belongs to Link. Animals that belong to people are most always pets. Therefore, Epona is a pet.
__________________
|Deviant Art|BA Chars|TLoZ: The Hidden Powers|Super Star Luigi: Battle Star Legend| Raddy is my wuvable ZU big brother and I love BrokenWing. <3 ![]() Fire Emblem: Dawn of Darkness |

| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Tags |
| link, pet, sidekick |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|