Just worked out what new Wii Zelda is about!

Originally Posted by Triforce of the Gods

Zelda Wii. It's supposedly being delayed till next year so they can see how well MotionPlus does before deciding whether to fully incorporate it or make it optional.

Mhhh, yeah, Miyamoto said something like this. But I don't honestly like it, it would have been better to get a Zelda, which is developed around MotionPlus capabilities instead of a second Twilight Princess waggle waggle adventure, which just happens to come with optional precise controls, which aren't of any use. But 1:1 swordplay definitely would be an awesome feature, they should focus on that and the possibilities coming with it.

And I never really cared about the story that much anyway. It's too messed up already.

Here's what I said in the other topic:

Originally Posted by The 10th Rider

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe she sacrifices herself or something to kill some great evil at the end of the game, therefor creating the master sword?

Originally Posted by Triforce of the Gods

Zelda Wii. It's supposedly being delayed till next year so they can see how well MotionPlus does before deciding whether to fully incorporate it or make it optional.

Where did you learn about TSA's info?

Here's what I said in the other topic:

But the Master Sword was created by the Ancient Sages during the Seal War...right?

Maybe the game takes place during the seal war?

Originally Posted by Zeldablue777

But the Master Sword was created by the Ancient Sages during the Seal War...right?

In A Link to the Past's backstory... yes. But Ocarina of Time then pretty much has overwritten that fact, since the Master Sword there already existed long before the actual Imprisoning War occured. And then Four Swords Adventures seemed to cover the Imprisoning War, but it used the Four Sword instead of the Master Sword.... which was backed up by the new version of A Link to the Past, that showed the broken Four Sword in the pyramid in the Dark World, which was supposedly then used to ban Ganon.... arrrhhh, it's messed up.

I hope, if they make a story-based Zelda, they either reboot the entire story (it's trendy to do so) or clean up the mess.

Originally Posted by Zeldablue777

Where did you learn about TSA's info

KeeSomething said it in the temp forum we had for when we were banned for "losing" the bet.

Originally Posted by Triforce of the Gods

KeeSomething said it in the temp forum we had for when we were banned for "losing" the bet.

And where did KeeSomething get his info?
It'd be nice if you told us the original source instead of trailing back one step at a time :b

Originally Posted by Teekay

And where did KeeSomething get his info?
It'd be nice if you told us the original source instead of trailing back one step at a time :b

He didn't say, but judging by the fact that he was defending how reliable TSA is, I'm assuming some site where TSA posted it?

Seriously it's TSA. He got a copy of TP before anyone else, do you really need to doubt his info.

Originally Posted by Triforce of the Gods

Seriously it's TSA. He got a copy of TP before anyone else, do you really need to doubt his info.

Yes.
It's just hearsay to me.
That's nice that he got his copy of TP first, but I don't see how he could have been told information about this game that no other reliable website or magazine has mentioned.

Originally Posted by Triforce of the Gods

He didn't say, but judging by the fact that he was defending how reliable TSA is, I'm assuming some site where TSA posted it?

Seriously it's TSA. He got a copy of TP before anyone else, do you really need to doubt his info.

I don't doubt TSA's info but I need to see it to believe it.

Your theory is a very cool one and I personally would love to see a Zelda game made with that story, however there is one major flaw. If this was the first Zelda game in the timeline, then how would Link have his tunic? Everyone knows that each Link inherited their tunic from the previous Link. OoT Link was the first one to have this tunic due to him being a Kokiri. So how could a different Link have it before him? I'm not attacking you and I like your theory, I'm just stating a fact.

Originally Posted by TwilightSheikah

Your theory is a very cool one and I personally would love to see a Zelda game made with that story, however there is one major flaw. If this was the first Zelda game in the timeline, then how would Link have his tunic? Everyone knows that each Link inherited their tunic from the previous Link. OoT Link was the first one to have this tunic due to him being a Kokiri. So how could a different Link have it before him? I'm not attacking you and I like your theory, I'm just stating a fact.

That's very true... I didn't even think of that before.

The only other place in the timeline I would put this game would be somewhere between Oot and TP with an OoT link, judging from the poster we have been given.

Jesus the first page and everyone is jumping down this guy's throat over a theory. Take a chill pill guys, speculation is all part of the game during every long wait for the next Zelda.

I think your theory is an interesting one, the origin of the Master Sword would really be a nice story for the next Zelda. Wind Waker felt like it had bits and pieces of that during the last two Temples, it worked quite well. If it followed the same theme, I believe upgrading your sword to become even stronger is the perfect motivation to keep going and to survive however long you can. Wind Waker never had a dull moment near it's climax.

Originally Posted by TwilightSheikah

Your theory is a very cool one and I personally would love to see a Zelda game made with that story, however there is one major flaw. If this was the first Zelda game in the timeline, then how would Link have his tunic? Everyone knows that each Link inherited their tunic from the previous Link. OoT Link was the first one to have this tunic due to him being a Kokiri. So how could a different Link have it before him? I'm not attacking you and I like your theory, I'm just stating a fact.

That's a good point, I'm in firm belief this game is after Oot and before TP like Miyamoto has stated anyway.

Originally Posted by OSM

Wind Waker never had a dull moment near it's climax.

Except you know...the 8 hours of straight triforce collecting. xD

Anyways I'm still convinced that this is the return of the Hero of Time (OoT/MM sequel) but I mean, there is always the crazy thought that the Hero of Time pulls the time-traveling thing again and appears during the Pre-OoT war events to solve a mystery or...something. (Like OoA, a Villian goes back in time to screw stuff up and Link has to fix everything)

But if this is seriously a continuation to where MM left off, I look foward to seeing like do more cart-wheel jumps.

Originally Posted by Ganon the King

Your flawed. You like attacking people for fun do you? Is that how you get all your posts?

My theory is still more likely than yours for the simple reason that we already know about the events in my theory, yours we dont know about it at all.

Anyway I just want people to discuss what it could be about.. though theres not much to talk about... You don't have to be a smart **** about it.

What is your problem? Teekay wasn't attacking you, or being a smart ass, just pointing something out. You don't have to **** a brick.

Originally Posted by Ganon the King

Your flawed. You like attacking people for fun do you? Is that how you get all your posts?

My theory is still more likely than yours for the simple reason that we already know about the events in my theory, yours we dont know about it at all.

Anyway I just want people to discuss what it could be about.. though theres not much to talk about... You don't have to be a smart **** about it.

gah, shut up please.
seriously your theory is a flop.
please just accept that.
although it is a tiny interresting, no one can be sure there THEORY (key word) is right. so please dont preach that your theory is right that no one else can have a opinion on this.

Well, we all know that his post is irrelevant and he has not returned to argue with it anymore.

So I think it's best that we don't continue to thrash his theory around.

But as I said, no one knows what will happen in the new Zelda game, or when it will take place, so it's silly to make a statement that you mention is dead set right.

Am I the only one that thought about future weapons (muskets and such) when they read the statement about a lack of sword? I'm not saying that is the case, I highly doubt Miyamoto would jump the shark on the Zelda series like that, but that's just the first thought that came to my head.

Originally Posted by OSM

Jesus the first page and everyone is jumping down this guy's throat over a theory. Take a chill pill guys, speculation is all part of the game during every long wait for the next Zelda.

Well, when someone comes here and says "hey, my theory is perfect and unflawed, so everyone who thinks differently can go to hell", what reactions do you expect? No theory is perfect, otherwise it wouldn't be a theory, but a fact. If he doesn't want, that his theory should be argued with or that someone tries to disprove his theory, then he shouldn't post it in the first place or say it's not a theory, but just wishful thinking.

Originally Posted by TourianTourist

Seriously, I stopped reading there. If you truly have the misbelief of being impeccable, then there's no point in argumenting with you. If you're not able to deal with objections to your theory and comprehend them, then you should not start a thread about it or state in advance that you just want people to say "OMG, you're teh man, your theory is teh best" and nothing else.

And your theory is anything but the "best possible one there is". You obviously haven't even looked at the official artwork yet, because what Teekay said about the fairy wasn't a joke or an offense. The artwork shows the Mastersword as a fairy/spirit or another kind of incarnation next to Link where his sword would be - and this fact is obviously not covered by your so called theory. Not to mention, what I stated earlier about Nintendo's ways of story developing when it comes to Zelda.

Are you insane?

That makes my theory even more credible.

She is the spirit/fairy that is sacrificed and becomes the Master Sword towards the end of the game which you use to defeat evil. The Master Sword is more than just a weapon as we know... its the blade of evil's bane therefore we are finally getting the game about its forging and forgive me not, making this sword is more than getting a blacksmith to hammer some hot metal - its using magic and forming pacts with sages and all the rest of it. This will be one big process.

By the way to you nosy people, this is a theory/assumption, whatever you like to call it. It seems like you all feel attacked by the fact that I'm saying this is the best possible theory out there. Though truth be told I haven't heard a better one. All I here is people saying, "You can't make theories yet we don't have enough information." Yes you can, there is easily enough information to work with.

I welcome all the people that agree with my theory - it is very good isn't it? But basically, to the guy that said I quit arguing, I didn't, I just don't get back to the forums very often because I have a life.

And to TourianTourist you manipulator, all I said was my theory is the best out there at the moment, not that is impossible to be disproved. I think you should take honesty lessons... honestly.