Is there going to be a part 2 of the twilight princess?

Originally Posted by Aziel Satori

Whatever game comes next is supposed to be different from all the other Zelda's before it.

A direct sequel wouldn't make too much sense.

^ Not unless something happened across the distance in the desert where Link will find the Gerudos and another whole land.

Given Nintendo's direction, they'd be stupid to continue an old story with the next game.

They want to drastically change the formula, that tends to take player concentration off of all else.

Desert sort of ends in cliff walls anyway...

Originally Posted by Aziel Satori

Given Nintendo's direction, they'd be stupid to continue an old story with the next game.

They want to drastically change the formula, that tends to take player concentration off of all else.

Desert sort of ends in cliff walls anyway...

^ Don't tell me that you didn't notice sarcasm punching you in the face...

Doesn't look sarcastic at all.

Sometimes I start to think people don't realize what forum they are in.

Originally Posted by Aziel Satori

Doesn't look sarcastic at all.

Sometimes I start to think people don't realize what forum they are in.

^ I sometimes realize why you are even here?

It's a Zelda forum. Nuff said.

No, it's Future Zelda, home of the gullible.

You'd have to just assume people would take your idea as sincerity, because guess what, some would actually believe it, and go make a thread about "how da greudos r wester more in da dessert, dey make sequl n u find dem!!"

Originally Posted by Aziel Satori

No, it's Future Zelda, home of the gullible.

You'd have to just assume people would take your idea as sincerity, because guess what, some would actually believe it, and go make a thread about "how da greudos r wester more in da dessert, dey make sequl n u find dem!!"

^ You take things far too seriously sometimes. Just chill.

No, has nothing to do with how I take things. You honestly, are unable to know how I actually take things. You only have an idea based on a presumption, again like I have told a few others, this is the internet, if you write anything down, everyone else can find out what you said.

It's just the way this area happens to be. When people say things here they tend to be sincere in them, no matter how ridiculous they might be.

Originally Posted by Aziel Satori

No, has nothing to do with how I take things. You honestly, are unable to know how I actually take things. You only have an idea based on a presumption, again like I have told a few others, this is the internet, if you write anything down, everyone else can find out what you said.

It's just the way this area happens to be. When people say things here they tend to be sincere in them, no matter how ridiculous they might be.

^ Perhaps they just want to say what they want to say. Doesn't mean that they really believe in it, but how they want to respond.

And another thing, I don't want to know how you take things. It might depress me.

No, merely enlighten you because your current view is mistaken.

See, thing is 99% of them do, and had you not replied by being rude, you could have simply avoided it.

Originally Posted by Aziel Satori

No, merely enlighten you because your current view is mistaken.

See, thing is 99% of them do, and had you not replied by being rude, you could have simply avoided it.

^ You make me laugh.

I'm not being secretive on the internet. I want to act the way I want to act because, chances are no one knows you at all.

Just be who you want to be. I sense that you are very paranoid in a way.

You should get your senses checked.
They are horribly maligned.

I never claimed you were being secretive, I only made that specific mention, in case you wanted to use the "You don't know what I think." retort.
Pre-emptive counter argument.

It's amusing how completely off a person can be in their assumptions.

My statement still stands, in this particular section, 99% of the time people believe what they say. There wasn't anything particularly different about the post you made to suggest otherwise. It's not any worse than ideas I've seen before in this section.

Do you expect people to be dismissive of the things you write?

I don't see why there can't be a sequel. Most Links have gone on a second journey before.

Because, TP had a solid ending - the mirror is destroyed, Zant and Ganon are dead (woohoo, Ganon will just come back again...), and it just wouldn't make sense to continue the story of TP.

Most of them have, but most of the times the stories don't have such closed off endings.

It's odd that they chose to do that, but they might not want to continue dealing with two seperate timelines, as they have made mention of trying to make the series more accessible, and nothing is more inaccessible than a convoluted timeline.

Originally Posted by Aziel Satori

You should get your senses checked.
They are horribly maligned.

I never claimed you were being secretive, I only made that specific mention, in case you wanted to use the "You don't know what I think." retort.
Pre-emptive counter argument.

It's amusing how completely off a person can be in their assumptions.

My statement still stands, in this particular section, 99% of the time people believe what they say. There wasn't anything particularly different about the post you made to suggest otherwise. It's not any worse than ideas I've seen before in this section.

Do you expect people to be dismissive of the things you write?

^ Your statement still stands? And how would you proove this? People might agree with me, people might agree with you and you have no idea how I think.

Afterall, I am Eternal Legend.

Anyway, you keep causing everyone to go off topic. Let's go back to what was being said.