Pie's Notebook

[mmmmm_PIE]

Pie's Notebook

So many Bombers-related activities, so little time! I apologize for the disarray of my notebook at the moment; I promise it'll be the hippest pinacle of self-centeredness around when I get a little more time.

Current Projects

The Curious Incident of the Oracle in the Timeline
*Complete Article. Awaiting Seven Votes*

My Bombers submissions and contest winner, this theory was my moderately succeful attempt to develop a hypothetical model which would explain the time travel related phenomana in the early Oracle Of Ages scenes. On the whole, I was more excited with some on the smaller concepts I considered in theory than the work as a whole; which can only possibly be correct through the first portion of OoA. Enjoy!
Oh, and 14 Pie points to the first person who recognises the title reference...

Official ZU "Oracle of Ages" Content
*Long term Project. In Progress*

With a moderate ammount of zeal, I will joing my fellow Bomber in an overhaul of the Zelda Uiverse frontpage game-related content. In the early stages of the project, my personal focus will be the Oracle Of Ages section.

The 32 bit Timeline Challange
*Incomplete Discussion/Social Project. Awating Co-operation*

What ammounts to a combination of the controlled discussion of an interesting issue in the Zelda timeline and a personal attempt to reconcile myself to the new environment of the theorist community. Stay tuned for more details.

Bomber's Policies

Voting Policy

In these, the early days of the Bombers, my primary motivation will be to further the group as an exposition of the admirable elements of Zelda theory to the fan community at large.
For this reason, the theories I choose to vote in favour of will be those I feel have the most appeal to non-theorists. Articles of extreme length, of developer activty related content, or of annoying complexity will get a no-vote simply because they are more applicable to the die-hard theorist than to the general site user.

[mmmmm_PIE]

Updates:
April 17 | 5:30 PM | Article Posted
April 21 | 1:00 PM | New Content

[the_Predator]

Lem told me that we are allowed to post / comment in other people's notebooks so why not do so? ^^ I like to look at these notebooks as personal lounges for each Bomber.
Anyway MP how come you "affiliate" so much with non-theorists? I know these will go on the main page but from my personal experience non theorists rather like to think of us as obsessed by it, and this whole theorizing "unnecessary and stupid" as well as "just a waste of time"... I personally think my articles are understandable to everyone but still I do distinguish and value more the opinion of a "hardcore theorist"...

PS. What's with that Theorist Renaissance? xD Elaborate, I like the idea.

[mmmmm_PIE]

Throughout this past winter, my primary goal in theorizing was to create a universal body of timeline knowledge was unquestionably true (either because it considered canon only or because all possible conclusions were given equal consideration) and working towards that goal I joined forces with a number of forum members toiled away on the Timeline Series.

The small response I received regarding the series from general fans, rather than the usual anti-theorist flaming, made me very proud of our work. It is that kind of responce I seek for the bombers... in the begining at least.

As for the "Renaissance" statement, it was just a whymsical responce to my impression of the board's current state. The scope and quality of posts, in many cases, is the best I've seen since last fall. Theorists are asking more question about more topics in more ways. I hadn't really had fun on this forum since the Zaius affair, now I'm skipping out on homework to spend time with you cats (and apparently I'm not the only one). Its just generally excellent.

[Sentient]

Originally Posted by mmmmm_PIE

Oh, and 14 Pie points to the first person who recognises the title reference...

It's a parody of "The Curious Incident of The Dog in the Nighttime"! I don't know what it is or who wrote it, but it was mentioned in English today, and as soon as I heard it, I knew those 14 Pie points would be mine.

[Mr. Lexxi Aileron]

Originally Posted by mmmmm_PIE

Updates:
April 27 | 5:30 PM | Article Posted

This was added to your notebook!
lol

Also, I wonder how it's already April 27 for you. Are you from the future?
(All in fun, my friend, all in fun.)

[mmmmm_PIE]

^Of course I'm from the future. Couldn't very well be from the present could I? pffft. Noob. =P

And I'm happy to award Sentient 14 Pie points... mmmmm... Pie points...
*Officially recomends Mark Haddon's "Curious Incident" to all yall*

[Sentient]

Sweet! When's the next set of Pie points up for grabs?

[mmmmm_PIE]

Ah... Bad news dude. The reckless injection of such a large ammount of currency into a economy which had become stagnant to the point of non-existence immediately resulted in a state of hyper inflation. The only hope we have fore restablization is to completely cease the production of currency while you burry your monies in a jar in your back yard....

[mmmmm_PIE]

A Challange
I would like to extend the following challange to any one of my fellow Bombers.

Where as I, The Challanger, beleive that I am able to support the case of a chronollogy in which The Legend of Zelda and its sequel Adventure of Link occur prior to A Link to the Past; and that you, The Accepter, may not offer the same degree of support to a chronoology where the inverse is true.
I am proposing an organised debate in an official format wherin these ideals may be discussed and our worth as shrews weighed.

In order to facilitate this contest, I humbly request the assistance of a second Bomber, The Mediator, who feels himself best able to maintain a neutral, non-judgemental posistion. His involvement will be as minimal as possible.

More details shall be discussed, and this general air of pompousness dropped, when the challange has been legally accepted. Good evening Sirs. =P

~~~

Raian attempted, last evening, to create a topic which would allow theorists to act in a social mannor below the current standards of this forum. In doing so he hoped to return to the theorist process a quality of competitivemness which he had found enjoyable in previous debates but missing from modern fair. Although I share his sentiment in past, I do not feel that a regression into closemindedness was the answer.
This is my answer, or atleast my attempt at one.

[Mr. Lexxi Aileron]

I volunteer to be Mediator.

I would like to question, though, whether your justification comes in the context of the two games in relation to each other, and in nothing else, or in their context as successors to other members of the series (TP, TWW, etc.).

[mmmmm_PIE]

Well, the second contest seems to have ended (as expected) with a disheartening whimper. My motivations waxxed and waned rapidly and chaoticaly over the last 30 days... to no respectable avail.
*Sigh*

I've got another solid week of exams/highschool graduation to close off one of the most insane (and probably most enjoyable) seasons of my life... in the mean, my activity will be about as dissapointing as it has been these last months. I really can't confrim the summer will bring a change of any sort... This meeting deal will very likely decide the future of my membership. Really hope to see most of us there.

C ya Saturday...