I don't have a proffessional opinion on this one cause I have seen Goldeneye but I can't judge because I haven't seen everyone Bond movie including the old ones but I did find while watching parts of Casino Royale (Which I didn't watch the whole movie of either) that the gadgets are more and more prominent. Now, I don't know if this is a result of modernization in the Bond movies or laziness (and I don't mean to offend anyone) on the part of the movie makers.. but it seems like in the New bond as compared with Goldeneye, there seemed to be less gadgets and more raw fighting on the part of Daniel Craig. I think that Goldeneye was possibly the best bond for its time but i think that we down the older ones because they aren't as modern and yes... may be a little bit cheesy. I have to say that when I first heard that Daniel craig would be named the next bond I was a little hesitant, I was used to seeing Pierce Brosnan who fit the bill perfectly as suave and charismatic, but it seemed like Craig brought a rawness or tough edge to Bond which was originanlly the intent for his character. I think that Goldeneye was an awesome movie but I for a. bad acting ,b. bad directing or c. bad storyline... I have seen most of one of the old think that we are adding a few too many gadgets and technology which makes up possibly Bond movies with Sean Connery and it actually wasn't all that bad...
P.S: i apologize if i offended any of you big Bond fans out there..

