View Single Post
  #12   [ ]
Old 07-11-2005, 01:23 AM
theL0stp0et420 theL0stp0et420 is offline
sTuPiD_aNd_RaSiN_dRy
Send a message via AIM to theL0stp0et420
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY, USA
View Posts: 130
Re: The Better Ocarina of Time Sequel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wookieman64
#1.This thread should be in General Zelda. And #2, MM was better because it had good graphics, a bad storyline(yet better than WW, still.) / And it didn't involve crossing the sea on a stupid 'living' boat.
If you read the first post, he didnt ask which is better, he asked which is a BETTER SEQUEL. Meaning, which fit better right after OoT, or whatever.

Anyway, I'd definetly have to say MM because it was the same hero and It continues pretty much directly after OoT leaves off. All the fans of OoT got what they wanted in that sequel-more of the Hero of Time. Also when you make a direct sequel you really should make it look more or less the same.
__________________
My Poems |My Space

Thanks to V99's sig shop for the awesome Sig and Ava
~*Proud member of the Nayru Clan!*~
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links