So you do not wish any longer to debate the merits of right-libertarianism or left-libertarianism? The arguments which I've presented regarding the inherent tendency in unregulated capitalism towards monopolies, the negative correlation between concentration of wealth and social mobility/societal well-being in 1st world countries, the idea of the capitalist workplace as a fundamentally autocratic enviroment, the collapse of worker's rights in a right-libertarian society and the rancher community's dependence on subsidies fly right out the window because your personal aquaintances still believe in the lie that modern America provides a level playing field and that the poverty and lack of social mobility that runs rife amongst the poor in America is something to be preferred to all other options?

I actually put some effort into responding to you, but everytime I do it seems the majority of my arguments are not even adressed. Are the arguments of your opposition completely irrelevant to you?

Trickle-down economics is a rather vital part of current American right-wing rhetoric. Check it out.

This is rather easily refuted by pointing out that for the last three decades the top 1% in America have had it better than ever, while living standards among working- and middle-class Americans have either become stagnant or actually decreased.

Half-assed economic theory? Like this, you mean? And no, nothing really seems to indicate that the working class strive for right-liberitarianism. Aside from personal anecdote, what are you using to back that up?