OJLink9 Theory on Link in Time...
View Single Post
) [ ]
10-01-2009, 09:17 AM
ﾘバゾﾗ : I'm just gonna go away and do... fish stuff.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dartford (Home)/ Reading (Uni)
Re: OJLink9 Theory on Link in Time...
There's new official art for Link from
, check the shield for some fun times- but if you want to use the original art and intention.
That is Link from the manual of
. More 'proof'?
A Link to the Past
'Zelda is your' by all accounts was going to read 'destiny', and the retranslation in the GBA version says 'It is your destiny to save Zelda' so good one there...?
Link did not have Epona, her appearance was cameo.
So who gets to choose what's Cameo and what's not now? You can't even claim sidequest for her- you need her for the game.
Is too old to be OoX Link.
OoX happens first. They also both have wooden swords. Link grows out of his young green clothes and into the rancher outfit ready for
. That's why he never seems surprised by the Triforce mark- he's already seen the Triforce itself. YOU CAN'T SAY IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.
im not basing this stuff on Nothing, Zora.
Except that is entirely what you're doing.
That Termina remark is founded off no tangible evidence at all.
Link plays the song of time in
and doesn't go back in time- in fact it does nothing to the time at all. This is proof and evidence of my claim.
*What actually happened*
What if Vaati had been sealed, not destroyed, in tMC
As blue, plus what if Midna had not destroyed the Mirror of Twilight
What if Link had failed in OoT
What if Link had failed in OoX and Ganon changed his name to Gannon
72 Hours Remain
Z.U. Awards Best Zelda Fanfiction
Hombre's Theorising Contest
Lupus: Design a Boss
The Secret Identity of Dark Link
Race to the Timeline
View Public Profile
Find all posts by River Zora