Is there going to be a part 2 of the twilight princess?

Originally Posted by Raven Satori

MM is a totally different type of game, but after you get everything in MM and beat it, there is zero reason to come back to it, outside of nostalgia.

There's collections to be completed (as with most Zelda games): heart pieces, masks, item upgrades, fairy upgrades, etc.

Well, I enjoyed TP more than OoT myself, but I enjoyed MM probably the most. But just because you remember it more than the others or enjoy it more does not mean that the other games are not worthy of your time. I could play every console Zelda game over and over and over again, honestly.

Originally Posted by Dark Link

There's collections to be completed (as with most Zelda games): heart pieces, masks, item upgrades, fairy upgrades, etc.

You are ignoring everything that makes MM different.

It does stray from the formula, everything in MM is about the little things, the quests you do for people and so on.

That's a big difference.

Despite that huge moon looming over you, you forget about it, because MM is about the little things.

Originally Posted by Raven Satori

You are ignoring everything that makes MM different.

It does stray from the formula, everything in MM is about the little things, the quests you do for people and so on.

That's a big difference.

Despite that huge moon looming over you, you forget about it, because MM is about the little things.

I was responding to the second half of the post:

"there is zero reason to come back to it, outside of nostalgia." - You

I know Majora's Mask sets itself apart from the other Zelda games. That's one of the reasons why I believe it's the greatest 3D Zelda game yet.

MM does things differently but that doesn't mean we can't count it as a Zelda game.

MM's main quest is shorter, but it's balanced out with everything else.

TP was quite unbalanced.

It's like girls:

TP is the giant-breasted girl that has a flat ass. It just looks awkward.

MM is the girl who is evenly proportioned. She has it all.

I don't know about you all, but I play Zelda for the main quest. I'm quite shallow in that respect. Only recently have I started doing sidequests in TP, etc. I've found that TP does have very good sidequests, to be honest. Collecting all the Heart Pieces is quite difficult.

Oh boy, if you've only played the main quest, you've really missed out. PH has the best place to start if you want to sort of get introduced to the little things. Very easy, easiest of any game. TP was really hard. I spent so long hunting down the last few Poe Souls...

Well thanks for the advice, I'm planning to replay the four Zelda console games first, actually, and then go back and play the sidequests.

I'm not saying that I've never played the sidequests, I'm just saying I play Zelda games almost solely for the main quests.

Mr_Cheese_723, If you only go through the main quest in TP, youre missing out on 1/3 of the fun(No offense). I loved TP a lot more than OoT because it gave me a lot more things to do that OoT didn't have. That's really what put TP over the top for me. It not only had a good story, it had great sidequests.

No sequel... please. Don't get me wrong, I loved TP, but I want to know more about the overall TIME LINE. Give me some closure on the subject!

What do you mean closure? The timeline has already been ironed out.

Nothing left to imagination as far as an official timeline is concerned.

I understand sidequests are important. I should get to them. I've gotten 34 Poes in TP and 16 hearts, and I'm halfway through the bug-quest.

That means 26 more poes and 4 more hearts. Not that long to go until you get infinite money!

Originally Posted by Baby Goron

guess what! nintys press confrence at E3 is tomorrow tuesday july 15 at 9:00 pacific time

so we'll find out

Originally Posted by GrandMoffTarkin

MM does things differently but that doesn't mean we can't count it as a Zelda game.

MM's main quest is shorter, but it's balanced out with everything else.

TP was quite unbalanced.

It's like girls:

TP is the giant-breasted girl that has a flat ass. It just looks awkward.

MM is the girl who is evenly proportioned. She has it all.

That is the best way of putting it I've heard.

OoT is the girl with the massive boobs and awesome ass, but has absolutely no personality what-so-ever.

I'd go with OoT for a brief fling, MM for a long-lasting relationship, and TP I'd avoid.

Hence why out of those 3, MM is my favourite, followed by OoT, then TP.

Sadly, I think not. I heard that an executive said that it would be the 'lat of its kind.'
Plus, a Wii remixed Vaati would blind me.

Originally Posted by GrandMoffTarkin

MM does things differently but that doesn't mean we can't count it as a Zelda game.

MM's main quest is shorter, but it's balanced out with everything else.

TP was quite unbalanced.

It's like girls:

TP is the giant-breasted girl that has a flat ass. It just looks awkward.

MM is the girl who is evenly proportioned. She has it all.

I whole wholeheartedly agree with this post and the quote. What's WW? No butt, no boobs, but a cute face and an awesome personality?

Originally Posted by Mafoofoo

Twilight Princess wasn't even a good game. It was decent at best. Majora's Mask's clock town alone smashed the entire game that was Twilight Princess in the balls with a spiked mace and left.


Majora's Mask > You and TP

I know that this was posted a while ago, but it made me lol and I agree with it completely. MM was the best Zelda ever IMHO. But I don't think TP needs a sequel; completely unnecessary