Quote:
Originally Posted by mohammedali
Even if we forget for a second that we never see or hear of Hyrule being brought back, and we ignore the King of Red Lions saying that Hyrule is washed away forever, and that we turn a blind eye to the fact that the land after WW is not to be named Hyrule etc. Even after ignoring all these point, the idea of a world so similar to OoT like FSA coming after WW is still proposterous. It's like someone putting the pre-historic era between the Dark Ages and WWII.
|
The conceot of a new land is a obvious part of WW's story, being mentioned by Zelda/Tetra and the Dekutree (Although they heve different ideas how to archieve this goal).
Daphnes dies the second after his whish...the Triforce upholds only whishes of living people.
Zelda sure likes the idea of naming the new land Hyrule.
Reincarnation is a common theme in Zelda (others would call it repetitaveness
). Ages pass and the world is still medievall/reneisance like, the same people pop up in every game, and so do the same places.
A whole land "resurfacing" from the oceans may sound strange at first, but hey it's a fantasy game and it certainlly fits with the overall theme of the Zelda games.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Lexxi Aileron
- Death Mountain magically spawned a second peak.
- The Lost Woods are now in the northwest, and the forestlands to the southeast have been partially cut down and replaced with a village.
- Lake Hylia is now at the source of the river instead of at the mouth.
- Kakariko Village has vacated the gorge nestled against Death Mountain and moved nearby the northwestern forest.
- None of the temples from OoT appear in any form in FSA.
- Vaati is the villain at large, and believed to be the King of Darkness.
- The regions of Hyrule are largely divided by water, almost as if each region was once its own island.
So, FSA is close to OoT? |
^ what he said. And were are all our dear friends from OoT? Impa, Nabooru, Darunia, Ruto? All gone, eh? ;_; And Malon and Talon don't even seem to know Link