Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Humbre de Mundo
^ How can you make a timeline ignoring the existance of a game just because you haven't played it? I haven't played ALttP, yet my own theory is much depending on that very game.
If I had only played, oh let's say FS and TP, I'd make my timeline as so:
FS---TP and then list a few points as to why, that nobody would ever believe since they've played the other games and know for a fact that FSA must follow FS.
|
Well, yes, you could take it that way, or you could take it this way.... Okay from now onwards this is my timeline....
Child Line: TMC - OoT-MM -ALttP - TP -LA - LoZ-AoL - OoS-OoA
Adult Line: TMC - OoT - WW/PH - FS-FSA
Now to explain my reasoning. Ohh wait. I've only played three of the games, so I can't explain why I placed the other games like that. How silly of me. I think you can see my point. You can't fully understand a game until you've played it, whether you think you can from reading Wiki's or not...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Humbre de Mundo
You're basically proposing OoT-MM---WW, except for some reason you have thrown in MQ and a parallell Hyrule that according to your graphic timeline merges without reason, making it quite hard to take seriously.
|
No. No. No. Honestly, have you people been reading the thread? How many times do I have to explain? OoT-MM---WW has nothing to do with this theory. I said that in my last post... If you want to flame that, do it somewhere else, because all there is to this theory is...
OoT........ (Place the games where you want.)
MQ.........
I am not proposing the OoT-MM-WW thing as part of the theory, it is just what I know as correct from the games I've played, so I used it for an example. I also said that you people who have more knowledge of the games, and believe the split, would if you agree with the MQ timeline Theory take it to be something like this...
OoT.....MM....TP
MQ.....WW
Now, how many more time do you want me to explain that?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Humbre de Mundo
There's the GBA remake of ALttP and LA DX... then there's Zelda AST, which is basically a remake of the orginal. I don't know how much you'd count the LoZ and AoL remakes, they'rea basically just ports though did had some changes in the manual.
And let me just say that the GBA remake of ALttP has storyline changes, something which MQ does not in any way.
|
Ohh. Just putting games on new consoles isn't a remake. Such as MM on gamecube, or LoZ on gamecube, or OoT on gamecube. They're not remakes, just different consoles that's why you don't include them in the timeline. Master Quest is actually a different game, with large differences, not just a console change, that's why it should be in a timeline..
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Humbre de mundo
Can you elaborate? because splitting the timeline is very logical and is by no means a resort for people who can't fit it into a linear timeline.
|
It is quite obviously a resort, because this is how it came about. People were theorising and trying to fit them into a linear timeline, but they couldn't do it, so they looked at OoT and discovered they could work a split to make a timeline work...
As I said before, many times, all there is to this theory is..
OoT......
MQ.......
Belief or disbelief rests with you, but frankly the way people have just shut this theory down, and brought in irrelavant material, I don't care whether you believe...