Okay, to begin with I just want to state, that the below, timeline, and the one in my sig is my timeline, that honestly, can't be disputed from the games that are in it, which are all the games I've played. Here is the timeline:

(OoT) \
-------(MM) - - - - - - - - - - - - - -(WW)
(MQ) /

Okay, so nothing special there, but just letting you know where I'm at. Now obviously, most people agree with the split timeline theory, when they've played enough games that a split is needed to explain it. So they go basically by a basic plan like this that they build on for themselves:

......Child- MM -TP..........
OoT
.....Adult - WW/PH......

So you can see what I mean. Now my proposal. Since the release of MQ, does the timeline need to split at OoT to child and adult, or could there have always been two parallel Zelda Worlds. It is world wide agreed that if you go back in time and change something little, something big will be different in the future. So is it possible that there isn't a direct split, but there is two parrallel worlds from the beginning, So in other words, here's what I'm proposing...

OoT...MM.....WW.. PH...
MQ.....TP.....

You can work in the other games where you want, but I think you people can see my point. There's probably some flaws when it's considered in more depth, but I see splitting the timeline as a resort, especially when there's two games, identical, but slightly different, and those small differences make the future big differences. So when I finally get TP, and more games and a linear timeline is too hard, I'd go to my MQ/ OoT parallel before the splitting at OoT double timeline. Just my thoughts, that I wanted to share. And please don't turn this thread into a discussion that Aonuma, or Miyamoto confirmed the split, but discuss you thoughts on the proposed timeline.

Happy posting.

__________________
Zelda Universe Member : Profile | Zelda Wiki Contributor : Profile