Think back to the 1800's, they used to have medicine shows, where
actors performed and vendors sold 'snake oil' (useless cure-all medicine)
just so that people in their company could pickpocket the audience.

Is this the era that our modern science should be founded upon?

I believe that science from this era is outdated.
This is why I am starting AAE: Athiests Against [Darwinian] Evolution
[I hope this name isn't already taken]

The reference to the medicine show is not a specific, or even a good
comparison to the works of Charles Darwin, but I think that there is a
remote connection. I do not submit it as an analysis.

I hope to bring strong unbiased facts that challenge evolution into this
discussion, as I have read up on the material. But first I should point out
what I mean when I say "evolution".

I believe in micro-evolution, that is evolution within a species. For
example, there is only one (or a few) species of dog, but through
selective breeding we have achieved dozens and dozens of breeds of
dog. HOWEVER, they are still dogs. We can't change them into birds,
or cats, or cows.

I DO NOT believe in macro-evolution, that is that one
species can evolve into another. Monkeys have always been monkeys
and will always be monkeys. Monkeys will never evolve into man, and
indeed I think they did not.

I hope this thread will be an appropriate discussion, those who do not
share my view should think twice before joining the discussion or flaming.
Those who agree with my view or oppose it are welcome as long as
they are capable of friendly, mature debate.

I will post some discussion material in about a couple of weeks. So be
patient with me.

Let's let this be a MOD friendly thread.
Talk to you soon

__________________

You can't Pwn me