Now before you go an tell me how much of a nut case I am, and that I'm stupid to beleive such a thing, please hear me out. I know you think I'm the weirdo who beleives that 9/11 was a set up, and that I'm probably just crazy, but this time around I have some very serious evidence that greatly supports that the apollo lunar missions were faked!
For those of you who don't know, or maybe you live in another country so you've never heard of it, the apollo missions were space missions run by N.A.S.A ., funded by the government, who's objective was to land a man on the moon and bring him safely back to earth. Now, what spurred this desire was the "space race". During the cold war with russia, the soviet union sent the first satelite into space, called sputnik in 1957 , you probably already know that. The us imediately started research and funding for rockets, and other kinds of space related things. It was obvious that the two countries were determined to out-do on another. Anyway, as early as 1960 the united states started sending manned vessels into space, starting with the launch of an ape named "ham". By the date of 1962, it was clear that the soviets and the U.S. had set their eyes on being the first to explore the moon.
in fact, John F. Kennedy himself said that he wanted to land a man on the moon and safely return him before the end of the decade. You don't think it's a slight coincodence that man landed on the moon in 1969? the last year of that decade? I think that nasa realized they couldn't possibly land a man on the moon within the decade, so they faked the 5 apollo misisons that made it to the moon, so that they would seem more technologicly advanced than their rivals in the soviet union. And below is the proof of that.
As some more educated people may know, the earth is sourounded by an area of high radiation known as the "Van Allen belt". Now, tests have shown that to pass through this belt, and not be killed from the radiation, you would need a spacecraft with walls made of 4 foot thick lead! Now, the control module were the astronauts would have been located had a sheild of aluminum, that was only 1cm thick!!!! If they had really tried to go to the moon, the Van Allen belt's radiation would have killed the astronuats.
The moon's mass is 1/6 of earths. theirfore, the average person should weigh on sixth as much on the moon, makes sense right? Now, I don't know about you, but I can jump almost 2 feet on earth. Now, the people on that supposedly landed on the moon were much older than I, so lets say they could probably jump about 1 foot on earth. Now, this should mean that on the moon they could leap about 6 feet, right? However, look at ANY clip of the astronauts on the moon, and you will see they never reach over 2 feet maximum. I beleive a simple bungee cord allowed them to move the way they did in the film footage, and it wasn't weightlessness. here's a clip that show's light reflecting off wires of the space footage.
here's the clip
BUT WAIT! IF THAT'S TRUE, HOW COME THE ASTRONAUTS DROPPED A FEATHER AND BRICK AT THE SAME TIME, AND THEY FELL AT THE SAME TIME? THAT COULD ONLY HAPPEN IN SPACE RIGHT?!?!?!
Not exactly. The reason a feather falls slower than a brick on earth is becuase of air resistance. Since their is no air in space, yes, a feather would fall at the same rate as a brick. However, one could also walk inside a sealed wind tunnel, the air could be sucked out of it, and the same thing could be manupulated.
here's another thing, why did the camera's on the apollo missions have such lousy quality? and why black and white? they could have filmed them in color to increase clarity. But that's just it, NASA wanted the images to look blury, and hard to see so that it would be harder to see all of their anomolies.
The shadows are wrong too. On the moon, their would be only 1 light source, the sun. Therefore, all shadows should be facing the same way right? here's your proof that their were multiple light sources (lighting on a studio set)
notice how the shadow of the lander goes east. While the shadow of the rock goes south-east. This is not possible unless their are more than one light source.
look at the following clip of apollo 16's lunar lift-off.
lunar lift off
Now notice two things. One is that the camera pans upword as the module lifts off. How could this happen? There would have to have been a camera man to do this. However, there couldn't possibly have been a camera man, becuase he would then have been stranded on the moon! also, the astronuats used film to record this. How did they retreive the film if they had just left the moon? Also, notice how when the lander lifts off, their is a flame! in space, since their is no air, a flame would not be visible. yet There it is! in plain sight! Does this not single handedly prove the missions were faked?
Still skeptical? read on.
Like I have stated a hundred times, there is NO air on the moon. However, when astronuats put of the us flag, it's blowing in the wind!!! that can't be because if there is no air, there's no wind, however, the flag is flapping around like crazy! proof that these missions were faked! here's the clip.
Blowing in the wind
And here, is the most convincing evidence of ALL!
On 3 of the missions to the moon, the astronauts took lunar rovers their to ride around on. They unfortunately had the leave these behind becuase it would have made the landers too heavy to lift off. Also, as you saw in the apollo 16 lunar lift-off clip, the base of the landers were left on the moon, as well as all the flags. HOWEVER! YOU CAN'T SEE THEM! Take a telescope and point it at the moon, your not gonna see any of these things. NASA has sent probes to orbit the moon, and take thousands of pictures to form one mosaic of the moon. However, do we see any buggies, flags, or lander bases in these pictures? NO! BECAUSE THEIR NOT THERE! you probably know of a site called google earth, that lets you use a satelite to view the earth. There is also a google moon. and would you look at that, still no sign of the remains! All you see is outlines of were the lunar bases SHOULD be, and were the flag SHOULD be. If they were really there, don't you think they would just show the actual thing instead of an outline?
BUT WAIT! WE GOT MOON ROCKS! THAT'S PROOF WE'VE BEEN TO THE MOON!
nope, space rocks don't necisarily have to be taken off the moons surface. IN antartica there are Ton's of sites were moon rocks are gathered.
HEY! THERE'S A CORNER REFLECTOR ON THE MOON! THAT'S PROOF HUMANS HAVE BEEN THERE!
A corner reflecter could easily have been placed their by a probe.
NASA HAD VERY POWERFUL TECHNOLOGY AT THE TIME! I'M SURE THEY COULD HAVE PULLED OFF A MOON LANDING!
Not really. The computer on the apollo eleven mission had 32kilobytes of memory. That's about the amount of memory a modern day calculator has. You really beleive that a simple calculator could control the spacecraft?
Discuss your opinions on the matter.