Quote:
Originally Posted by Ganon the King  I ddidn't even want this game to be a sequel to OoT. In fact, TWW is barely a sequel to OoT. MM seperates OoT from TP and TWW. I love this. Why do Nintendo bother saying theres a timeline, when really there isn't. Yes they are connected somehow, there is a timeline. But if Nintendo were stupid enough to build a perfect strengthened link between OoT/ MM/ Tp/ TWW, I'd be really upset. Glad its not like that.
You do notice that OoT has a gap of 100 years to TP? And theres a gap of hundreds of years for TWW. Each of these games have a different graphics style. MM would be boring, but because it runs on OoT's engine they are quite similar. having different graphics styles for each of the three ( ooT/ TP and TWW) and each being so vastly different it does not make sence for them to be "pure" sequels. I can't imagine TP being a sequel to OoT in a 'true sequels' way. A few mentions of the Hero of Time was enough. |
Here you are, ranting up and down like Nintendo just blessed the Split Timeline theroy with
TP. Whatever.
Obviously, you don't rember that the correction to WW's placement after
OoT was hundred
s of years, not a hundred.
TP is exactly a hundred years from
OoT, not hundreds. So your happy joy-joy frency dance can stop now.
TP does no harm or good to the timeline discussion for either side. Its just there after
OoT. Period.