Quote:
Originally Posted by mmmmm_PIE
Where I actually able to have a long discussion with the developers;
1) Why tWW?
It changed the nature of OOT's ending, the nature of OOT's connection with AlttP, and the nature of the entire world of Hyrule. Still, it was not he greatest story a Zelda game had ever seen. Why did you choose it?
2) Why FSA?
There were elements in this game which could have made everything better. It could have replaced OOT as the SW and linked the flooded Hyrule to a new world, why couldn't you follow through on your connections?
3) Why continue jumping around?
Up until tWW broke the system, the Zelda releases followed an excelent patern of release. Nothing like that exists any longer... why not?
Of course, those aren't easy things to answer, and would not really help us in the first place. I just wopuldn't trust Aonuma to be hinest with me on more general questions. To date, he has always talked more about development than final product.
|
That is rather an aggressive position to take and I certainly wouldn't expect anyone to dare ask such questions. I'm being serious here, are there three good questions that perhaps I haven't come up with that we could just possibly get Aonouma to answer?
PS: TWW explains why the Hylian civilisation disappeared before the SW. FSA explains the nature of how Ganon can spread the Dark World to Hyrule (my opinion). The only real inconsistency that has been established is the absence of the Gerudos in TWW.