Hmmm, what particular component of the Split?
Creator intention? Physics? Single timeline inconcistencies? MM connections? Counters to arguments against? Its a broad subject.

I'd be happy to answer any questions you have, as a theorist who once shared your conviction, but first I want to warn you that it is epistemology, no theory itslef, which denies the Double Timeline. You cannot possibly argue the Double Timeline to someone with a particular view of the timeline.

You would first have to convince me of that viewpoint, convince me that theorist had a right to imploy inductive reasoning in their theorising, beofe you could hope to convince me to beleive in the Double Timeline. I do not beleive you can do that, but I would happy to argue with you anyway.

Finally, in regards to your signature, i would like to point out that the split is not extinct, it is still the prevailing theory, or atleast a supported possibility, on many forum outside of ZU.