Media
Forums
Walkthroughs and Guides  
icon
Zelda Wii U
icon
A Link Between Worlds
icon
The Wind Waker
icon
Oracle of Ages
icon
Oracle of Seasons
icon
Skyward Sword
icon
Ocarina of Time
icon
Spirit Tracks
icon
Phantom Hourglass
icon
Twilight Princess
icon
The Minish Cap
icon
Four Swords Adventures
icon
Four Swords
icon
Majora's Mask
icon
Link's Awakening
icon
A Link to the Past
icon
The Adventure of Link
icon
The Legend of Zelda
The Legend of Zelda:
Zelda Wii U
Walkthrough
Overview

Nothing beats a great story. A truly good story will sweep you up; immerse you in its depths so that you experience the fullness of its twists and turns. You don’t want to leave it, because the world and events that it weaves around you are so compelling that you feel the need to stay and see what’s around that next corner; to find that next revelation, that next detail that fleshes out the fiction and brings it to life.

Among Zelda fans, people often have a preoccupation with the story. Make a thread in a forum asking why people love the series, and you’ll get at least a couple fans saying that the story is the reason (I believe that this is usually a gross oversimplification which stems from people lacking understanding of their own love for the series… but I digress). But what is a “story,” exactly? What makes it good? You could have the best plot in the world, but that doesn’t necessarily make the story as a whole a worthwhile one. Conversely, an unremarkable plot does not always make a bad story.

The best stories are character-based. A story that deals with human, believable characters is the most engrossing, griping, and emotional one. As human beings, we identify with human-like characters, and the more we identify with characters, the more we are drawn into their world and lives. A character that possesses depth, motivations, growth, and a personality is truly a work of art. It is characters like these that are the building blocks of any great story, and it is the affects that events have on characters that gives them impact and importance. When a sad event happens in any story, you feel sad because you empathize with the characters that are experiencing this sadness.

The Zelda series traditionally has strong characters. Not as detailed as in many games, and you’ll never find as much sheer dialogue as in some other genres… but from a thematic and design standpoint, they are strong, simple characters. A perfect example would be Marin, from Link’s Awakening. She only has a few pages worth of dialogue throughout the entire game, but for years I have found her to have a huge depth of character and emotion. She was simple: a girl who dreamed of a world outside her small island, who sits on the beach and sings to seagulls. Into her world comes Link, a man from the outside world she dreams of. She falls in love – not with Link, but with what he represents: freedom and the wide world out beyond the confines of her life. That is it. Simple, but that simple, elegant concept is portrayed so strongly and subtly that to this day she is easily one of the best characters of the franchise. And ever since, Zelda characters have followed that mold: strong, simple, and memorable. Just look at the way people latch onto characters like Malon or the Windmill guy and remember them forever.

Twilight Princess’ cast of supporting characters is a masterpiece. I can say with confidence that (with the possible exception of Majora’s Mask) it is the best of the series. I was blown away with how good of a job the Zelda team did at bringing these characters and their interactions to life. I will even go so far as to say that the work done on the supporting cast was the highlight of this game.

The main reason for this is that they actually involved their characters in the troubles of Hyrule. Looking back over the series, it’s almost as if Hyrule is untouched by everything. In a Link to the Past, their King is dead, they’re under the rule of Agahnim, and Ganon is ready for a full-scale invasion. Yet, with almost no exceptions, everyone goes about their lives as if nothing is happening. It is the same in Ocarina of Time. Even in the future, when Hyrule is supposedly under the iron grip of Ganondorf, only Castle Town is really affected. The Gorons? They’re imprisoned and slated to be executed as an example, but once you free them they go back to life as usual. The people living in Kakariko? None of them seem to care about what’s happening in the world around them. The same detachment can be seen in the Wind Waker. Throughout the series, you never feel any real sense of involvement from the NPCs. Nobody reacts to the troubles of the world. Prior to Twilight Princess, the only real exception to this was Majora’s Mask. This is not how it should be. When a land is invaded or endangered, people should notice. Men should be taking up arms to guard their families. Merchants should be ripping people off and selling stuff at outrageous prices. The armies of Hyrule should either be destroyed or organizing some sort of resistance. Children should be kidnapped by monsters, leaving apprehensive and despairing parents left behind to try to rescue them. Hyrule as a whole, and not just a few central characters, should bleed and need a hero to rescue her. Not gratuitously, but enough that the world you play in can become a part of the story, something more than just a simple setting.

Twilight Princess is an enormous step in the right direction, one that the Zelda series has needed to take for years. The people are involved in the story. You get Rusl telling you that the forest has grown more dangerous. Monsters actually break into supposedly safe areas and kidnap children. When you return to Ordon village and sneak around as a wolf right after the children are all kidnapped, overhearing the reactions of these villagers trying to deal with the situation… it sent shivers down my spine. The whole situation is orchestrated beautifully, and the reactions of the villagers felt authentic. I absolutely loved the way that Rusl was wounded from fighting the bokoblins, and how, when he was suspicious that they were prowling the village again, he got back up and limped around with his sword, ready to defend his village once again. That is the sort of thing that breathes life into a world. It shows that, although Link may be the hero, others are affected and willing to fight for the cause as well. It gives our characters more dimension. Kakariko village is another great example; the scene when you first arrive as a wolf and see Barnes, Renado, and the Ordon children in the sanctuary was a very cool one.

I am a huge fan of involved characters, ones who are willing to put their resources to their fullest use to achieve their own goals, rather than just simply sitting back and absentmindedly letting the hero do everything. There are a variety of reasons for this. Being a hero who saves a bunch of helpless incompetents is all well and good, but a game can have so much more. If you have a bunch of other capable characters fighting the good fight, it puts the hero’s actions into perspective. It shows that you really are that hero, really are a step above even the best of what the rest of the land has to offer. Zelda games… rarely accomplish this. They tend to have a collection of NPCs who can barely tie their shoes, let alone help you save Hyrule.

The second major reason why I like involved NPCs is that they tend to be cooler, more authentic characters. Examples of involved NPCs in past Zelda games are characters like Sheik, Tetra, Darunia, Impa, Quill, Mido, Link of the Gorons, Malon, Ralph, and practically every character from Majora’s Mask. These are all characters that did their best based on what they were capable of, however little that might have been. They didn’t just stay in one spot and say the same thing over and over again whenever you talked to them. Of course, all of these characters actually played specific and relatively important roles in the main stories of their games. They’re not just random NPCs.

But that is the beauty of the NPCs of Twilight Princess; they’re not just random NPCs anymore, they’re characters in their own right. Like Majora’s Mask, actually. The developers managed to give a huge number of even minor NPCs some role in the story, even if it was only as victim. And they responded in kind; as victims, rather than just relocating to Kakariko Village and pretending nothing happened. In Ocarina of Time, the Castle Town refugees in Kakariko don’t act like anything happened; they don’t act like their home was destroyed and infested with the undead. But when all the children of Ordon village are kidnapped, not only does the entire village feel that blow, but many of the characters actively work to get the children back and prevent it from happening again. Remember Beth’s father? The lazy, no-good one who whines about his wife bossing him around at the beginning of the game, and who seems incapable of accomplishing anything? When you come back to Ordon as a wolf after the children are kidnapped, he starts summoning hawks and attacking you with them. It was a minor touch, but the way he talks when he does so shows a bit of depth and growth. Here was a minor character that was actually affected by the events of the story, whose attitude and actions reflect the changes in the world around him. The game abounds with minor details like that, at least during the first half. I was very impressed.

Not only does the home village of these children react accordingly to their loss, but when they arrive at Kakariko Village, the residents of that village respond to their arrival. They got involved, however briefly, with the events happening in their world. I’ll say it now; I wasn’t too happy with what the development team did to the atmosphere of Kakariko Village in TP. But I quickly looked past that, because its chief resident, Renado, was such a strong character.

These involved characters can be seen throughout the entire cast of Twilight Princess. Telma? She was a great NPC. She didn’t show much growth, but she had personality, heh. And she was a fighter; she sees Link as the swordsman he is, she got involved with Ilia’s memory problems, and her bar is the headquarters of a party of warriors that I loved. As I said earlier, a hero who has capable followers and admirers is more impressive than one who doesn’t, and the group that meets at Telma’s bar definitely gives Link a boost in that area. There is something about small groups of vigilante freedom fighters that attracts people. Robin Hood is a classic example. It has that whole roguish romantic hero thing going on.

So yes. The group that fights for Hyrule – Aura, Chad, and Ashei – was a nice touch to the game. The fact that Rusl turned out to be the fourth member was even better, further creating an interconnected web of characters. It showed that these NPCs are part of a wider world, rather than just remaining isolated in their corner of the game. Knowing that there were several other people fighting for the future of Hyrule, and actually moving around the world to accomplish their goals, definitely helped create that feeling of a cohesive world. I was very happy when they showed up in the final dungeon to save Link’s ass, too. Even a hero needs to be rescued very now and then, and I like it when developers remember that. It was disappointing that they didn’t show up again; that part of their involvement seemed like an obvious loose-end, something that deserved – needed – a conclusion.

I did think it was extremely cruel of Link and Midna to exclude Chad from the whole Sky Palace thing. The guy had spent his life researching it, and so had his father; the least they could have done with let him in on it. Bad Link, bad. Share the fun of seeing and doing everything with your poor little allies.

The epitomes of these involved characters are the children of Ordon Village. You all know who I’m talking about; Malo, Talo, Beth, and of course Colin. They are there from the very beginning, Links’ friends and admirers. They are also the most involved characters in the game. We get to witness the way their personality develops and gains depth through all the events that happen to them. At the very beginning of the game, they are normal children; they tease and bully, play, and look up to their hero: Link. They are simple, but strong and authentic. As stand alone characters, they are relatively boring, but when they are put together and begin to interact with each other and others, they shine. We get to see Malo and Talo picking on Colin, their excitement over Link’s new slingshot, their eagerness to beat monkeys to death… They all undergo a bit of growth after they are kidnapped. Not the usual lose-your-childhood traumatic sort of growth, but they mature a bit while retaining that childhood (Except Malo. He’s just bizarre, and awesome in a quirky sort of way.) An example of this would be the way that after Colin gets kidnapped a second time by the Moblin lord, Talo decides to do his part by standing watch up in that tower. It’s the sort of thing a kid would do, but it’s still a far cry from the way he bullied Colin at the beginning of the game.

Colin is interesting because of the way he idolizes Link. Talo looks up to Link in the sense that he thinks Link is cool, but Colin actually looks up to him on a deeper level as a person, too. One of the best parts of the kids is that they actively look up to Link; this is the first time Link really gets credit for his actions, the first time he gets any real admiration for what he does. This also helps give us a glimpse into the character of Link himself – more on that later.

Another thing I enjoyed about the kids was the way that their presence affected other characters around them. In Ordon, they are obviously the heart of the village, the hope of its future. When they are torn from their home, Ordon and its residents noticeably feel that wound. In Kakariko they made a difference, too. People act differently around children; they speak differently, they might act in a nurturing/reassuring manner. Having children around gives any writer an option to show us more sides of a person’s character. We see this with Renado and Barnes – having the children around gives us a better glimpse into Renado’s character. It’s also obvious that Barnes doesn’t know the first thing about kids – another part of his character that we wouldn’t know if the children weren’t there to reveal it. Telma taking care of Ilia and her lost memory gives us the opportunity to meet the true side of the barkeep. Children are a powerful story-telling tool, and I am glad to see the Zelda team using them.

Of course, human characters aren’t the only ones populating Hyrule. Twilight Princess has the series’ classic Gorons and Zora, and one new race: the Twili.

I’ll tackle the Gorons first. Visually, the design of these Gorons was incredible. They took the original Goron design, beefed up the race as a whole so that they were more warlike and imposing, and then gave them swirled tattoos that looked absolutely sweet. Gone are the spindly-limbed rolling rocks of prior games; the Gorons of Twilight Princess are modeled after Darunia and Darmani. The visual side of any character, their design, is extremely important in setting our view of them and their personality. The Gorons were a resounding success in that area, and their aesthetics went hand-in-hand with the general character traits that the development team gave the Goron race. They were portrayed in this game as a proud people, aware of their own strength and perhaps even a bit arrogant about it. They start the game angry and withdrawn from the Hylians of Kakariko Village, trying to sort out their own problems. You find that this is a recent development, and that the Gorons are usually a pretty open and friendly race. Once you rescue them, they return to that, and I must say, I thought it was pretty cool. In Twilight Princess, the Gorons are more than just golem creatures holed up in their own little city; they’re friends to Kakariko village, traveling entrepreneurs, and allies in your own quest. I greatly enjoyed seeing the way that the Gorons were a part of the world beyond their mountain. They show involvement in the world and the story as a whole, rather than act as an isolated piece of the game. There are many examples of this, but my favorite is the way that some of the Gorons wanted to help the people of Castle Town by helping Malo open his bargain-priced shop.

The Zora are very similar to the Gorons in many ways. They feature a sweet aesthetic look that takes the original OoT Zora design and runs with it, giving us those cool bits of Zora clothing and armor. For the Zora, getting their movements to look fishlike and slightly alien was just as important as the design itself, and I think the Zelda team nailed that, too. Sadly, I thought that the Zora race wasn’t as well done as the Gorons. With the Gorons, there is a distinct and immediately apparent racial personality, which is reinforced by the actions they take and things they say. I bet you that everyone who played through TP to the end could tell you that the Gorons are proud, strong and know it too, and that they like hot spring water. And that they have cute kids. But the Zora… there is nothing that people can really latch on to as definitive traits of a Zora. They are ultimately a flatter race than the Gorons; just kind of… there. And even that they did worse than the Gorons. I mentioned that the Gorons involve themselves with the world outside their immediate domain; they actually act as if they are part of Hyrule and have a stake in it. You can go to Castle Town and find that there are some Gorons there; selling things, talking to people, etc. But the Zora are nowhere to be seen. Even when the Zora prince is missing and the Zora should be sending out soldiers to locate him, search parties, envoys to Castle Town… there is nothing. You can talk to some of the Zora and they’ll talk about how worried they are for the prince, but you never actually see any action taken. It is possible for a group to be isolated and still feel like a cohesive part of the world, if they have reasons for it, or a history of being that way. But that is not the case here. Nobody ever mentions or talks about how Zora are reclusive and stay in their own little corner of Hyrule; there is no justification for that anywhere in the game. It’s not a terrible thing; most races in all previous Zelda games work the same way. But it is disappointing to see the development team improve one race so much, while letting the other one stew in Ocarina of Time-era isolation.

One problem that both groups suffer from and always have is that there is no individuality from person to person. Every Goron, with the exception of the named ones, looks the same. Every Zora, with the exception of even fewer important ones, looks pretty much the same. This problem is especially apparent for the Zora: only two Zora, the dead Queen and the little prince, stand out at all. None of the rest have names. None of the rest do anything. The Gorons, although not perfect, are much better in that regard. There are several Gorons that stand out from the rest, not because they look different or have names, but because they have specific roles or do specific things. There is the hot spring water merchant in Castle Town, the one that crushes through that rock barrier for you south of the Castle Town, some shopkeepers, etc. There are one or two Goron children, and they stand out by virtue of being kids. And pretty cute ones, considering they’re made of stone.

Outside of the unnamed members of both races, there are some more important members of each. The Zora, once again, failed to keep up with the times. The prince and his dead mother, although better than all the other Zora, didn’t do much for me. They were depthless. I don’t even remember their names. The Prince shows some growth at one point, but it’s pretty forced and unconvincing. Which is too bad, because I think that was a good opportunity for a great character. Ruto and her father were both more memorable than the Zora royalty of Twilight Princess… which means the Zora characters took a step backward.

The Gorons fare better. We get the four Goron elders: Gor Coron, Gor Amoto, Gor Ezibo, and Gor Liggs. None of them are hugely important or involved characters, but they have cool designs and, especially in Ezibo’s case, entertaining dialogue (“Brudda,” heh). And they’re memorable; unlike the two Zora characters, I actually remember their names. I especially liked Gor Coron, because it seemed like he exemplified everything that the Goron race was supposed to be in this game. On the other hand, the Goron chief, Dargus, was a let down. Previous experience with Goron leaders, such as Gor Coron and Darunia, lead me to expect a pretty cool guy. Dargus ended up being a dim-witted thug. It was also such a contrast to the other, intelligent Gorons that it was noticeably out of character for them to have a leader like him. On the Goron front, he was the biggest disappointment.

The Twili were utterly pathetic. I disliked their design; very ugly creatures. And if the Twili were descended from Hylians who were banished to the Twilight Realm by the Goddesses, than why look so bizarre? They certainly don’t resemble Hylians in any way. I wasn’t expecting the Twili to be as important as the Gorons or Zora, but I at least expected to be able to talk to them. No such luck. All I got to do was turn them from really hideous monsters into ugly monsters that still couldn’t talk to me. If it weren’t for the fact that Midna and Zant were Twili, then the whole race would have ended up a more colossal failure than the Zuna, from Four Swords Adventures.

There were other disappointments, too. Throughout this article, I have been talking about the way that Twilight Princess’ characters showed more involvement than the characters of previous Zelda games. The way that Nintendo managed to use the events that were happening to give added depth to even minor characters like Beth’s father. There are many examples of this, some of which I have already named, some not. This sort of thing greatly enriches the game and its characters, making it more immersive, giving us the sense that Hyrule and its people make up a living, breathing world… but it only does so for the first part of the game.

Twilight Princess suffers from one of the same problems that the Wind Waker had – it’s absolutely amazing until you reach a certain point, and then the quality suddenly drops off. In the Wind Waker, the whole game took a turn from masterpiece to average as soon as you finished visiting Hyrule Castle for the first time, and didn’t pick up again until the grand finale. Twilight Princess’ drop wasn’t nearly as drastic or damaging… but it was still disappointing to see its handling of NPCs take a turn for the worse as soon as you got the Master Sword or so. Past that point, the new areas suddenly become barren and lifeless – there is not a single person to talk to in the desert, let alone a bunch of characters to interact with. Snowpeak? Please. It’s a single linear path that leads straight to the dungeon. Aside from the two Yetis, there isn’t any character interaction there. No new characters are introduced, very few new events featuring characters you’ve already met happen, and on the supporting character front the game pretty much dies off.

The first three or four dungeons are spaced out by tons of stuff you can do with different characters, locales, and smaller quests. You have events like escorting Telma’s wagon, you get to see Renado and Barnes deal with the children at Kakariko Village, you rescue Colin from the Moblin lord, you free the Zora from the ice; the list goes on and on. All of this shows us other characters being involved in the game world… and it all stops after the Master Sword. You still get a little bit here and there, mostly during the sequence where you finally restore Ilia’s memory, but compared to the first half of the game it is miniscule. Which is really too bad.

On top of the poor pacing during the second half of the game, there were character-related problems elsewhere. As I said, Twilight Princess’ supporting cast is brilliant… what there is of it. Sadly, I found a distinct lack of interesting people in places like Kakariko Village and Hyrule Castle Town, despite the fact that cities and towns should have the greatest concentration of NPCs. Traditionally, Zelda games have always featured their strongest groups of minor characters in the villages. AoL’s characters were all in villages. Kakariko Village in LttP was the foundation that the series has built on ever since. OoT took that even further, and Hyrule Castle Town and Kakariko Village were packed with interesting people, nooks and crannies, minigames, shops, and buildings we could go into. We all remember the Skulltula house, Dampè the Gravekeeper, the Windmill guy, the woman and her dog Richard, the wounded soldier… the list goes on and on. The Wind Waker one-upped even that, in many areas; I never ran out of things to do and people to interact with in Windfall Island. The Minish Cap’s central town was simply amazing. And Majora’s Mask? Clock Town was the greatest town in any video game, period. A masterpiece. I certainly never expected Twilight Princess’ towns to compare to Clock Town, but I at least expected them to equal Windfall Island. What a surprise these developers had in store for me!

Kakariko Village was desolate. Empty. Devoid of life. There were a grand total of three characters living there. This is partially masked by the Gorons and Ordon children who are temporarily occupying the space, but they fail to truly hide the emptiness of this Kakariko. When you first arrive you overhear Barnes talking about how a woman is killed by the Twilight monsters, and how a bunch of the other villagers rush forward to try to save her – too late, of course. There’s a partial explanation right there; that the Twilight monsters killed off most of the population. But that doesn’t cut it. If that’s what happened, then why are there not more signs of it, more mention of the catastrophe that has befallen the town? Why don’t the surviving characters offer us some show of grief?

If Nintendo had depicted it as a small outpost, then it wouldn’t matter. But it is clearly depicted as a village, complete with multiple buildings, Barnes talking of other inhabitants, mention elsewhere in the world, a “village shaman,” a sanctuary with an ancient statue in the basement, and a graveyard that suggests a long history.

At least Kakariko Village had Renado and the Ordon children to tide us over and mask its emptiness. Hyrule Market had no such luck. It would be a mistake to call it empty, or desolate; it was actually teeming with more people than any village or town in Zelda history. But there is a catch: you can only talk to a small fraction of them. No, the Market was not empty, but it was soulless. Where are the interesting NPCs in every corner? The minigames? The sense of bustle… but with characters I can interact with? Where are my sidequests involving gossiping mothers, or the Elvis impersonator, or an awesome pictograph guy? Why am I stuck with only two alleys and a few buildings to go into? Hyrule Market is designed and presented to us as if it is a large town, but it is really the narrowest, smallest, emptiest town the series has ever had. Even the residents of LttP’s Kakariko were more memorable and enjoyable than this town’s selection.

And then there is the lack of public awareness in the town. Remember when you first meet Zelda in Twilight Princess, and there is a flashback to the invasion of Hyrule Castle? We see Zelda with her knights arrayed before her, ready to fight for the future of Hyrule. Then Zant and his monsters come in, crush the resistance, and force Zelda to surrender. Here, at last, was a sight of the Knights of Hyrule fighting or their Princess and their Kingdom. Here is our first glimpse of a Hyrule that is at war.

We never see that again. Throughout the game, as I traveled through the different areas and saw all the different denizens of Hyrule, I noticed that nobody seemed to remember that there was actually an invasion of Hyrule Castle, before the land was covered in Twilight. It didn’t bother me, because these people were either isolated and not really the sort of characters who would be concerned, or they had problems of their own. But the people of Hyrule Market lacked that excuse. Zant must have fought his way through Hyrule Market to reach the castle. Judging from the flashback, the Knights of Hyrule would have put up a fight at every step, before finally being forced back to their innermost sanctum. But where are the signs? Where is the talk? The NPCs in the market fall back to the old problems of being completely oblivious to the dangers that are befalling their kingdom. Not only is there no apparent memory of any attack amongst the populace, but even the soldiers that guard the Town act as if nothing has happened.

The pinnacle of this obliviousness comes a bit later, when Hyrule Castle is encased in Zant’s twilight barrier. You can see this barrier from miles off; it’s visible from almost anywhere in Hyrule field, in Zora’s Domain, on Death Mountain… and in Hyrule Market. But there is no mention of it. The people of the market are completely unaware of the fact that there is a barrier a mile high around the castle that overlooks their town. The castle that should be the center of their town, and a source of pride for them. There are exactly three people that notice, as far as I am aware. Two of them are the guards at the castle gates… and their reactions are hardly authentic, just puzzlement and the vague idea that they should keep it a secret. The third is a Goron, who expresses a bit of worry; a Goron who doesn’t even live in the town, and is just there to sell some things.

You almost wonder whether such absent-minded buffoons deserve to be saved from Zant and Ganon.

Twilight Princess had flaws on the character side of things. It had some flat characters, it had a disappointing town, some oblivious NPCs, and the later stages of its quest were less eventful than the first. And when characters become less believable, the player’s ability to stay immersed in a game or story is lessened. Such flaws certainly damage the game… but not enough to dim the brilliance of the Ordonians, or the Gorons, or characters like the children. Next to it’s successes, Twilight Princess’ character flaws fade to background complaints, mere annoyances that, although a bit irritating, can be brushed aside as inconsequential.

Finally seeing characters give Link the respect and admiration he deserves is a wonderful thing. Seeing the four adventurers storm into Hyrule Castle to save Link is something I will remember for a long, long time. Malo-Mart? Hahahah! Telma and her winking… The heartbroken reactions of the Ordon parents when their children are kidnapped is the stuff masterpieces are made of; simple down-to-earth characters that shine with a feeling of authenticity rarely found in the world of games.

Of course, supporting characters are only half the battle, and arguably the less important half… what of the main characters? How did Zelda, Ganon, Zant, Midna, and Link himself fare in this installment? I was originally planning on tackling them in this article, but I ended up writing a hell of a lot, and I suspect that those main characters are going to get several more pages out of me. I’ll deal with them later.

For now… Twilight Princess, I am proud to see you join the ranks of the Zelda series.

______________________________________________________

If you liked this article, we will be releasing such articles consistently over the next few months, so if you would like to be kept up-to-date, we will be updating our Facebook and Twitter pages to let our followers know of each new Zelda article. You can also just subscribe directly to our RSS Feed.

This retro article was originally posted February 5th, 2007.
Related Topics
  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thareous Thareous

    For me, Twilight Princess had the most advanced character development I've ever seen. You look at people such as Midna and Colin and you'll find them to end up having the softest natures (exceptionally surprising for Midna). These to practically made the game for me: Midna, because she only wanted to help her people, even go as far as exploiting Link's aid.

    Colin, because even though he was picked on by Ordon's other children, but he told Link he'd be like him, but not carry a sword or anything. And he proved this by showing Courage just in the episode prior to the cutscene, when he pushed Beth out of King Bulbin's way, ready to sacrifice himself.

    There are others I'd love to catalog, but they've been mentioned in the article. If you've already pored over it, I hope you can now see the characters as I do–as though seeing them through my eyes. Twilight Princess is different from all other titles because the characters showed Courage, at last, and decided to take a stand against Hyrule's evil.

  • ballsjohnson

    This whole thing you wrote was retarded. You don't actually like zelda if you bitch this much about the characters faggot

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Thareous Thareous

      He wasn't "*****ing" about the characters, frigate. He was giving perspective to everyone. If you reread the article, you'd see that.

    • Hyruliant

      Haha wow just get out.
      I'm laughing at how stupid your comment was.
      Seriously.

    • Bttrthnu

      Haha! Fail, troll!

      • Chad

        haha that comment was so bad he doesn't even deserve a fail.

    • AcesulfameZ

      I'm not a man who normally disses people for their opinions, but honestly this comment was probably the dumbest thing that has ever crossed my consciousness.

      Congrats…

    • nje

      He made valid points about the incohesion of many characters in earlier zelda games. There's simply no denying that the zelda developers screwed up in those games in this one aspect. You just don't go casually about your daily business like nothing happened when your home town was destroyed by a magic maniac that's flying around erecting giant black floating citadels and creating rings of fire over mountain tops.

      But this is so rediculous I'm just going to chalk it up to a satirical parody on the constant compalints someone is always making about these articles.

      ..that or you being a dumbass.

      • nje

        oh, crap, maybe I meant to say "incohesive nature".. I think incohesion isn't a real word.

      • ChainofTermina

        that last line seems much more likely.

    • ZeldaI

      LMAO looks like everyone on this site sent balls johnson to the sacred relm like Link and the Seven Sages did to Gannon.

      • ballsjohnson

        LMFAO you grow balls.

    • jesse

      ugh… are you, like, 14 or something? i hope you are because i can excuse a 14-year-old for being a dumbass; everyone at 14 was a dumbass. this man had many valid points and well formed opinions- i found it very enriching. but i was wrong i guess. thank you for informing me that he's a faggot. boy, is my face red.

      • riley d

        so, im 13 and im not a dumbass
        but i agree that B.J. is a faggot

  • Liz

    Very interesting! I myself noticed several of the points you articulated in this article, which is really great as I felt unable to word it properly. I feel all real issues were addressed in this articule, but not in a way that it bashes the game, which is great. In particular, I noticed the Hyrule Castle's desolate, "soulless", as you described, atmosphere. This bugged me so much.

    Excellent article, very interesting and enjoyable to read thanks!

  • Seth

    So true my favorite game is Twilight princess every things so different my other favorite is Wind Waker the feeling of exploring everything I was at Ganandorf then my friend moved and i don't have the wind waker game :(

    Don't know where to buy

  • Artimus-Maora

    Excellent view; I noticed amny of the same points you mentioned here. XD Castle Town: "What barrier? What war?"
    Now I know why I liked those Gorons so much. XD

  • nje

    This was very interesting material. You should continue this article as a series discussing various aspects of what makes a good zelda plot and story, area design.. There's tons to talk about here. I'd like a whole section detailing every aspect of zelda games, myself.

  • heroofcourage

    Absolutely one of the best articles I have read so far! Please go on with the good work! Your brilliant. Like one of the comments above, I'm also unable to word my thoughts that good ;-) I would like to read an article like that about the twilight princess plot, from you, too. I have the feeling, that something is very wrong with the story. Why are there so many dark and magical objects you have to collect(mirror shards AND fused shadow, the master sword, tears of light etc) And eventually, ganon emerges out of nowhere and wants tries to get the missing triforce pieces, doesn't he???! It feels like they used too many deus ex machina for the plot, but it didn't work, I think they had to focus more on one thing….

    • Chad

      I think someone talked about it a while ago those things you talked about are called plot coupons they are only use to advance in the game and make the game longer otherwise there really is no point to them

  • Sanity's_Theif

    I always had a feeling there was something more realistic about TP than just the graphics, but I could never put it into words, you good sir just did it all for me, very good read and I agree 100%

  • ChainofTermina

    This is why I like Zelda games; the story. I only wish other Games got this involved with their plot. Sonic used to do that, but lately Sega seemed to give into peer pressure and only give a crap about mindless gamplay so they could please their whining fan boys.

    So many games take inspiration from Zelda, I kind of wish Sonic would. story wise I mean. and that goes for Metroid too-WTF happened there!? I used to think that Metroid Other M's story was weak because Nintendo was out of practice with telling story driven cinematic game plots, but they seem to do okay with Zelda. what's Nintendo playing at with Metroid? they can just reach over into the Zelda section and sci-fi it up and Metroidize it for Samus. what's going on? why's Nintendo focusing all thier story power into Zelda? granted, it makes for an awesome game, but I wish they could do what the do for Zelda to all their games, Metroid, Mario, Kirby!

    wow, I didn't mean to go into a rant there, but I guess my passion for good story telling got the better of me. Other games' stories need to be more like Zelda. or then again maybe I'm talking nonsense, maybe Zelda-esqe story telling should be reserved for zelda only. I don't know, I'm tired.

  • Hannah

    I feel like the oblivious, almost selfish nature of some of the characters give us a better look into Link. I mean come on, these people do almost nothing as a whole and yet he risks his life multiple times for all of them. Sure it would always be nice to have a ton of more involved characters, but at least these ones let us look at Link in new ways.

  • aeolus

    Finally, someone else that sees the good in Twilight Princess, haha. I do disagree about Queen Rutela though (Zora ghost). I thought she was great. The scene was beautiful, imo. but I didn't like the Prince (or Princess in the Japanese, or so I've been told). Prince Ralis was kind of annoying, and ugly, haha.

    And I do agree about the Twili…. what the hell WAS that anyway? Why would Midna look so human, and wear clothes, and Zant look so… the way he does, but the other Twili just look like black and white blobs… I don't understand why Midna was so ashamed to be seen as a little imp when they look like THAT…. so the Twili were a FAIL! It may have been due to the game being rushed toward the end. If waiting a little longer is what it takes to never let something like the Twili happen again, then they need to take as much time as they want, haha

  • Taha_Soysal

    I can definitely relate to the part about Castle town. Half of the people there were zombies… At least the guards were sort of fun to scare as a wolf. Also, during the second part of the game, I felt like I wanted to shake some of the people, while yelling something like: "You really don't notice that gigantic golden pyramid surrounding that castle just over that way??!?". Anyway, very interesting article!

  • KeeSomething

    I felt that the characters in Twilight Princess had as much depth to them as post signs.

    • Chad

      I feel that you're comment above has as much depth to it as a blank sheet of paper.

  • Subrosian

    That's the real reason Twilight Princess and Majora's Mask feel more mature, not just the graphics. Hopefully we won't encounter another plunge in character development at the end of Skyward Sword (assuming there WILL be interesting characters… hehe) like we did in Twilight Princess and especially Majora's Mask.

    Also, I feel that the first part of Ocarina of Time had some good development, and the overlying theme of friendship made the game more mature. Great article.

    • Subrosian

      I meant Wind Waker, not Majora's Mask…

  • http://mytriforce.deviantart.com/ Ezlo

    THIS is why I love Zelda

  • Lunatic_san

    Great article, I would definitely love to see more from this person in the future.

  • Kaepora21

    I think those that have read the entire article will agree with me that, while starting off spectacularly, like the author's analysis of the Wind Waker, the writing dropped off immensely about halfway through and never seemed to recover.

    I agree that the characters in Twilight Princess are very involved, making this game special. The author, while saying he agrees, pointedly does not when over half of his analysis focuses on the negative aspects of NPC creation in Twilight Princess and not on the positives. Even his compliments toward some, like the Gorons, for example, are only masks for more criticism toward the Zora and Twilii. Later on he contends that even the Gorons are not as memorable as they should be! Clearly this author has no appreciation for game designers as he expects literally every single Goron (and if we were to extrapolate, every character) to be completely and totally unique. Even aside from arguments on the physical limitations on memory and CPU processing, it would make the game so involved that the player would have to remember hundreds of characters in order to understand the story. unifying the designs of minor characters is a shortcut, but a necessary one not only so we can play the game sometime this decade, but also that the game's plot can be understood and experienced.

    I need not delve into the lambasting the author lays on the people of castle town and the design of Kakariko village, you can read it yourself up above. Point in case, the author does not understand the design of these two areas. Castle town probably did not recognize the barrier because of they were not directly involved with the castle in day to day life. And if they were to recognize it, is there anything they could have done except scream in fear? A town full of frantic citizens is no joy to play a game in. And judging by the "old west" style of architecture that embodies Kakariko, conclusively it is designed to look like a ghost town of sorts, abandoned by its people and mostly destroyed both by the Twilii and the lack of a stimulating economy. Kakariko is not supposed to be a bustling center of commerce, it is run down and degraded, allowing Link to bring the town back, which is a positive NPC interaction the author fails to note. Kakariko is at the beginning of NPC development, and the author should not try to characterize it as something it is not.

    While I will not try to answer every point (I already feel long winded and haven't even addressed half of my contentions) I will say that the increasing contradiction throughout, the obliviousness of the design of the game, and the author's irrational expectations all contribute to a long winded rant that ultimately supplies very little substance or growth. It seems that less biased analysis (and shorter articles, for that manner) would greatly contribute to the effectiveness of writings on this subject.

  • Linktomyass

    Seriously?

    I could peck away at a deep response to this whole topic but I’ll just say this.

    While a select few characters were fleshed out with more detail, the supporting cast was crap. The result? I felt like I was in a fake world with a few lead characters that talked to much.

    TP sucked.

  • freedom4

    Yes, this is why Twilight Princess is my favorite game of all time. It does feel like much more of an epic story with real characters than almost any other video game I've played.

    I agree with 90% of what this author wrote. The only thing I'd comment on is that I'd always gotten the sense that the Zora were just not that involved with the rest of the world. They'd always seemed isolated. Even in LttP, you have to go search for them behind a secret waterfall, and they were quite hostile. Thus, I think it was fine to treat the Zora as more of a distant, mystical race. Think of it this way: the Gorons are like the Dwarves in the Lord of the Rings, while the Zora are like the Elves. The former are easier to relate to, the latter colder and less personable.

    I do strongly agree that the Twili should have had more of a role. In the Twilight land, they seem to just stand there. It would have been nice if they had at least thanked Link for rescuing them.

    I really hope the designers of Skyward Sword read this. I'm worried the developers are currently focused too much on the Wii MotionPlus "swordplay" and not enough on the plot and characters.

  • http://www.escepticoantetodo.blogspot.com dorsh

    I agree with most part of the article regarding the emptiness of the Zoras and the lack of individuality of the Gorons. Yet, I don't see why complain about lack of "individuality". As General Patton said in the movie: "this whole individuality stuff is a bunch of crap". Nah, just kidding. However, I think what the author is asking is to create a "individual character" for all gorons and all zoras. The only problem is that if you do that, you are giving them far too many "human qualities". One of the great features about these races is that they are not human, therefore, giving each and every one of the members of this race a distinct personality is almost like taking their away that condition from them. It's inevitable that these creatures share some common human qualities, but I think the writers did the right thingnot going one step further. Sure, the Zora Prince and Dargus were pretty flat characters. There's a flaw in character development there, but it is immensely more difficult to give "every character a personality". If the writers had done that, the game would have been released far more later and we all know that we as Zelda Fans, can be a little annoying when Nintendo tells us to wait more time. Not all characters can be charismatic and show some qualities. That would be the ideal, but given the short time the market gives to developers sometimes, it's inevitable that there are gonna be flaws.

    Regarding NPCs' involvement, I liked the fact that the characters were involved and the fact that they were aware of the troubles in the world. However, I think the author speculates with the fact that Hyrule was at war with Zant's troops. The only thing we see throughout the game is that the Castle of Hyrule is taken by them. It could have been a surprise attack after all, and probably the common people did not notice

    However, I have my doubts whether the characters involvement throughout the whole game could have improved the game. I know it's just me, but I hated the kids. It's good they have a personality and they realize the problems in the world, but if the writers had imposed more involvement from them during the game, they would have turned into a huge nuisance. They had their time to shine and they did it well, but exposing them more!!! Common!!. It's almost like asking some Zelda fans to hate them even more. It's good that they appear in the game, but they took far too much time at the beginning. Personally, I really hated the beginning of TP. It was slow and I felt that I was forced to play the role of the nice citizen for far too long. You had to wait too many minutes to encounter the real action and that, in my opinion, was rather lame.

    Now, I agree that the results of that minutes certainly pay-off throughout the whole game experience, but Zelda should not only be NPC development. There's a lot of action and solving puzzles, which are also an important part of the game. It's true that character development makes it better in general, but the writers have to be very helpful with what characters they want to develop, as it's almost impossible to give everyone a personality. I found very realistic that only a few people talked to you in the town, or do you think it's normal for the people to talk to some strange kid dressed in green with a sword. If I were them, I would certainly keep my distance. Yeah, there's lot of people there who looked interesting, but they were normal people trying to live their lives. It's true the game lacked sidequests in the town, but I liked the sense of isolation you got in town. It felt very realistic to me, at least. That's what you get from towns anyway. A crowded place, but empty on the inside; just like many places in our world, whether we like it or not.

    In brief, my point is that you cannot force character development too much or it would backfire. The writers have to be very careful with what characters they want to develop, because let's face it, Zelda fans may be a global community and all, but we don't all share the same views about how we want it to be. Some people hated Navi, apparently most of them hate Tingle, so in order not to repeat those experiences, the writers have to be very careful not to create unlikeable characters like they did in the past. Everyone agrees that the zoras and the gorons have to show more character in future games, but writers have to be very careful with making them likeable characters, but trying to keep them as fantasy creatures, not humanize them too much. For example, if's there one thing I liked from the Gorons in "OoT, was that they appeared to be a strong, proud race, but rather lazy. I loved that dichotomy, especially, when you woke them up.

    Anyways, that's what I think at least.

    greetings.

  • MidnightAsaph

    I think the article is ironic, considering the emptiness of Hyrule Castle Town.

    I won't say much, other than that I thought this game was empty, and the characters were terrible. I could probably conjur an argument, but it's not too important to me. But Twilight Princess sucked (imo). Majora's Mask takes the cake.

    • U SUCK…WORSE

      Geezes, Twilight + Midnight = SAME. That connect with u?

    • QueenxLink

      You think that Hyrule Castle Town in Twilight Princess was EMPTY? It had more people than in Majora's Mask and Ocarina of Time, I'll tell you that!

  • http://www.escepticoantetodo.blogspot.com dorsh

    It's good to have so many views about Zelda. I wish for the day writers and developers actually recollected writings from what Zelda represents to all Zelda fans, so that they know our expectations, our hopes, and our disappointments as well. I could think on doing a survey, but so far, there a lot of Zelda games I haven't play (yes, a troll would say that I'm not a real Zelda Fan and bla bla bla), so I cannot know whether they have tried certain ideas or not.

  • Anon

    tl;dr

    So is the bottom line that Twilight Princess sucks?

  • Raphael Canaris

    I disagree with what this article has to say on the Zoras,

    Some of the Zora actually do move away from their domain. They settle at Mt. Death's hotsprings.

  • http://www.officialdating-information.info Article

    Thanks , I have just been looking for info approximately this subject for ages and yours is the best I have found out till now. But, what about the bottom line? Are you positive concerning the source?|What i don’t understood is in truth how you are not actually much more neatly-favored than you may be now. You are so intelligent.